[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] To sign root-servers.net or not?
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 June 2024 15:56 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C496C14F748 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_L5Gzkotdr6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9AFC14F5E0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57d044aa5beso698740a12.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718726173; x=1719330973; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DvQzMTftPhW91ydtHSYQ+bpw8ojFaBIIhmhjjfiXzSk=; b=WoCkTsoaRO7J3DlLK5R3ymqMEUL0iu9VN7Yx/uUevyXkQFeb8m7ZFLrMfk1p/2cxNf 1Af0TsiW8GKJcy+3sV0jkUjvwVahd4plkxfn0mB3sFbhSGpFq1lz6HbcTnvHJbSlIY10 UmMdZbxbHZrx7nRGke9XOqYvRnfpJM2MDoIv3wP8SGN+NPa68v1oros36Z6M6vRL7wvO zgqXqliZ2DBPckICeZGy/Jvx09bh31YPShzxY/cRL5Ali1803o68F+8cvgsTi5zBf2CE fMw1loz6us5ttJzDmIBIJl0gxSli4IaeKWXMkjcs3xKvC9FrjyblHHzMxoMiHQWNaiB4 eqSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718726173; x=1719330973; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=DvQzMTftPhW91ydtHSYQ+bpw8ojFaBIIhmhjjfiXzSk=; b=iLmdmLwXVc3fQqyxfzr2xmPIGnl/k8qlSF1nIf2W0+QG5SfNJDDa0bYep7ZPRHun6c v7t5+ML3SSu+BOzRD85jC0B4A2Z5NeCg/FdWTG9Zlz/Q4vZsQLfL3WTVLjagO3QNftQ/ vJasU4g4VgBiP6XCt4vRTPK1J1MqGBY1XDqoHZwN1QtbHRzH7SISTVkoor88JPfep9C+ cDCxEIAE9Stv18gCHoQitci9ou9gGjfRnbBqiWWXV7ygm+MAWYDSH3w2IqklzqTgXyQr Wgg4bbufqRje910H7om7VeOSUj4Qk7pbYUOdxJIXzVgemnS76zQB129TEtUJ6kQxOaat HBMA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU8iRQNVV41X/ZVu+o4g7u8UuAq57+reKnZXWf7isVaP2L/mBxjlI6e7aAmdDSp5mow99G7owYFn0bM/zkXZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEdypAPYuud0WHpRQOiKjcxwaJne1cgLUEjAl8YMiOcGctHub3 dSwcyGFvzejqwXdwtPR3IuPMxJ6fgcgq18FItsHgqQnsYNmK/b1jDrl5uLcJ6N9uoXyO6ToWX+Y hxKLLrty6S/Ph5+GjRgzh2LsOc+CZ/Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG+SdDyQHPA0ePVydlXz9GOpFPE3BmT1Gh4aquOLHebNdPPGPNv7c03+VgFK+yIttT6ZWLk/ryMOROyV7WekJQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:40c5:b0:57c:de6e:75d9 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57cde6e766dmr5088986a12.32.1718726172869; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+GH-8XsxPqCvBQ2p1mDwz1uG0+RPdyrKX8P=LRS6Am_aQ@mail.gmail.com> <426AA277-1698-4EE4-B3E9-745DB9EAA947@strandkip.nl> <CADyWQ+Hn260OEfcF8HEJ0jbfGOvL3GZnQN9=Bpod40TVxY8U_g@mail.gmail.com> <E257658D-F24C-4B84-929B-47FF3BCC1209@apnic.net> <0B3AB1AD-9A4C-41A1-BD20-6C13B590F3A0@icann.org> <2B612F68-5783-4BF4-9AE6-0BC711032FBC@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <2B612F68-5783-4BF4-9AE6-0BC711032FBC@apnic.net>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:56:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+E5pJtVJtMNxFtajg520HMNtAPjVLNvP0d=qnQkwyWvEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000000097d061b2c1f17"
Message-ID-Hash: DBMYLM52OG3KCHCDUUYAUBC746YGKMAT
X-Message-ID-Hash: DBMYLM52OG3KCHCDUUYAUBC746YGKMAT
X-MailFrom: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] To sign root-servers.net or not?
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pJSXl53vjI7LZnwBkZqx7dbq4TA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
Thanks Paul for the data (and the thoughts!). I also missed this and have some reading to do. tim On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 7:05 PM Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote: > Thanks for the pointer! > > g > > > > On 18 Jun 2024, at 7:17 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote: > > > > On Jun 17, 2024, at 13:33, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote: > >> > >> [change of topic] > >> > >> " things that the IETF may not have the final say on." > >> > >> Possibly true in this case, but not having the final say is very > different to "having a say" > >> > >> I would find it interesting to understand the current state of thinking > in DNSOP as to > >> whether to DNSSEC-sign the root-servers.net zone. Are there folk with > thoughts > >> and opinions on this topic? > > > > Thoughts *and data*! A few weeks ago on this list ( > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JEChrjGKGhQzwo5dCuWZm4lcm5g) > I posted: > > > >> FWIW, this new text is somewhat based on the findings from NLnetLabs > and SIDN on a project supported by ICANN. You can see the report, and an > earlier report on a related topic, at: > >> > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/octo-commissioned-documents-2020-11-05-en > > > > --Paul Hoffman > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-leave@ietf.org >
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP]Requesting final comments on draft-ietf-dn… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final comments on dra… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… A. Schulze
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comment… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comment… jabley
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comment… jabley
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comment… Willem Toorop
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comment… Willem Toorop
- [DNSOP] To sign root-servers.net or not? Geoff Huston
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] To sign root-servers.net or not? Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Joe Abley
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Joe Abley
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Joe Abley
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] To sign root-servers.net or not? Geoff Huston
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] To sign root-servers.net or not? Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final com… Tim Wicinski