[DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be
appreciated even if only for my own education), and some nits.

Special thanks to Tim Wicinski for the shepherd's write-up and the WG
consensus, I would have appreciated a little more text about the intended
status though.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

I share other ADs' comments about the lack of formally updating

## Section 2

Suggest to change the title s/considerations/discussions/ as this section
explains the recommendations of section 3.

## Section 3.2

S/near the time of publication/near the time of publication of this document/ ?

## Section 7.1

RFC 8174 should be normative

# NITS

## Section 1
Should "zone apex" be explained ?

## Appendix C

I am not sure whether Peter Špaček appreciates his last name writing in the I-D
;-) (my first name, Éric, suffers from the same issue ;-) )