[DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences in Response Drafts

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 16 August 2016 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8472712D0EE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5R7ugmK8ywm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54CFA12B02C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f123so69282763qkd.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SSZa045sZGwo+5yTiyHeLhB8xtGqWGi4Zjq9melhA6E=; b=vdUg1e/4M0FxQFz9+zHvc7FC474BjG7o3AezxfBxRqS6a2r6y79rP/T9VtFNFv+W8e ouBTW0NwOp0/c84r0YWFP0ap6xUlm8QxQccDezxbVzeYbJqGsITpi01nQVit0p/aUTVC XDNEM/AVuUYrnJQZjocTBgUtv1RlgidnGag/JzN+NnX7n2FbijhNvOlHJ94Vzorx8qew Ksi1m+akusMpTW+oPTXvJbuPhGvtIYhwTco/caFFjCf0NuctVRScFMfvIt5DWwRqwmR6 wfws3WYUcyMCCeTUJrqoOG03PTVXxoPswQbQmm5c2095GlP1Zxpf6tZa+6V+zcaPJRGL 41Rg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SSZa045sZGwo+5yTiyHeLhB8xtGqWGi4Zjq9melhA6E=; b=BvKeVo0bm1NLIgw1Pzpb+g9VEJj11lClhrQdhYzkA6asIFddDZ/tx6WBauEz6ZK9ad cwR9LDyjR1tn2vVz65HHQvHYGmqHdAPoBXFk94UDeJ8hqgQNk09TpUdTU3EUl+5txm6H XvhKwj5ipnd5/O0KTdO8Jw0E6dq2SAk5hjIvUdulO4idwbmWNmQwA9HCcvO0hNvKQaAN aTudOAbghWqPVuc0Kk+WYvkrSona5J4BTPJRnnI3csTQT4BH+PWL4JpVBhTXtGFVteL8 wsQTntz2dOmJk/L3OTKavt1GMTWofNfNnOOw7X55dESNtMcMsiw9OdM8KIJBLO4J5VHl gtng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous4c9hFivdUxs1x+pSbMnaunsUkfu/yWP4epyOl3FyON5NPmALsDwYfLyCLs9wHPw==
X-Received: by 10.55.36.65 with SMTP id w62mr41503726qkg.49.1471352226108; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from twicinski-ltm.internal.salesforce.com ([204.14.236.215]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v126sm13754950qkh.30.2016.08.16.05.57.05 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <665d8bd3-4229-eb98-1688-2460dcb943b6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:57:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pUUNo1qs9cS3qCH3af9WCl1IuQY>
Subject: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences in Response Drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:57:15 -0000

All,


In Berlin we had two presentations on different methods of returning 
multiple responses:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes/

and a presentation in Buenos Aires:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free/

All of these documents are attempting to solve a larger problem in 
different ways.
The end result is "Return Associated Answer" to the client.

The question is starting to coalesce around these two premises:

- Do we want to Server to PUSH any or all Associated Answers, or

- Do we want the Client to PULL any or all Associated Answers, or

- Do we want the Status Quo?

thanks
tim



(Thanks to Paul Hoffman for assistance)