Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2671
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 23 December 2009 23:50 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7083A6A42 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:50:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YlR7rIdydwRk for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB323A68AD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBNNmlX0011236; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:48:47 GMT (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <200912232348.nBNNmlX0011236@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:37:07 GMT. <20091223183707.GA29415@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:48:47 +0000
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2671
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:01:41 -0000
In your previous mail you wrote: I've found another "culprit" in the program DNSMASQ - distributed with FedoraCore 10 and later versions of RedHat. => I asked some days ago the author to change the defaut to 4096 and in his answer he wrote it will be fixed in the next release. BTW as you can easily put the right value in command line / config file I asked the same thing to OpenWrt for the default config but it bumped because I was not in the list (I've noted to retry). Thanks Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr PS: there was another DNSSEC fix in dnsmasq, I'll ask if I can forward the full answer to this list.
- [DNSOP] RFC 2671 bmanning
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2671 bmanning
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2671 Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2671 Masataka Ohta
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2671 Francis Dupont