[DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-01.txt
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 06 March 2015 13:30 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3C41ACE13 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 05:30:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEBS55Ehafjm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 05:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05301A1A67 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 05:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id E86DB280609 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:30:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2762805FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:30:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C88B38044 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:30:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:30:13 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150306133013.GA29880@nic.fr>
References: <20150119221050.6022.11328.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150119221050.6022.11328.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.0
X-Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae i686
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pZsQGkxEXcHvFBqdtea5hNvq_K4>
Subject: [DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:30:38 -0000
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:10:50PM -0800, internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote a message of 43 lines which said: > Title : DNS Terminology What about adding a definition of "public suffix"? I suggest the text from <https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/wiki/InternetDomainNameExplained>: > Public suffix: A domain under which people can register subdomains, > and on which cookies should not be set. [with good examples > afterwards] This terme seems actually used, unlike the strange FLD <http://domainnamewire.com/2015/02/18/domain-definitions-fld-for-free-level-domain/>
- [DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffman-d… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffm… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffm… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffm… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Suffix? (Was: I-D Action: draft-hoffm… Stephane Bortzmeyer