Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-00.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 24 February 2015 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595F51A3BA5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:28:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iqotu8RcgOV for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30B2C1A1BCB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7EF1FCAC7; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:28:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D4E160068; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:35:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c122-106-252-81.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.252.81]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DFE0160052; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:35:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C30F2A45149; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:28:09 +1100 (EST)
To: "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20141128152445.12986.10641.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BD6A54D2-B3AF-40C9-8890-B5AF347E9516@vpnc.org> <54EB33E4.6090506@nlnetlabs.nl> <49DEE35910F1A6438E9805F4DEBBA3070AEE3E52@038-CH1MPN1-042.038d.mgd.msft.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:46:17 -0000." <49DEE35910F1A6438E9805F4DEBBA3070AEE3E52@038-CH1MPN1-042.038d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:28:08 +1100
Message-Id: <20150224192809.3C30F2A45149@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pe8lRONi1KwMRdvn67XJyykAL6A>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:28:17 -0000

In message <49DEE35910F1A6438E9805F4DEBBA3070AEE3E52@038-CH1MPN1-042.038d.mgd.msft.
net>, "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" writes:
> "Asynchronous" makes no sense to me. In what way is an AXFR "asynchronous"?
> 
> "Authoritative transfer"? As opposed to what? Non-authoritative transfer? "Author
> itative" seems rather redundant in that phrase -- AXFRs are always comprised of a
> uthoritative data, aren't they?

You are transfering the data you are supposed to be authoritative for which make
it a "Authority Transfer" or "Authoritative Data Transfer".

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org