Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 07 April 2017 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40461200C1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lzG6FB4Z462z for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0629129531 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.7.93] (104-7-65-172.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.7.65.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83E8161F9C; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 18:45:02 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <58E7DE17.9020200@redbarn.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:44:39 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.12 (Windows/20170323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
CC: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <148942077219.17007.342057944218385620@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170328143352.GA12923@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <FD1D5AD8-6907-4144-AB31-F1226779CDE3@powerdns.com> <88FAB370-FFE4-4E90-9B31-651C09798983@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <88FAB370-FFE4-4E90-9B31-651C09798983@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pfq-dgu_RbpmUqsEXDkcaqGZwYk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:45:09 -0000


Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 23:57, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> 
>> Notwithstanding your stubborn redefinition in 8020, the text in 2308
>> is correct and this erratum is wrong.
> 
> That "stubborn redefinition" has modern WG and IETF consensus.

well, yes, but, it's still wrong.

-- 
P Vixie