Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 05 February 2022 16:19 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD65A3A17AE; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 08:19:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZagzoC-8dsg; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 08:19:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4BC3A1A01; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 08:19:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A40EB954; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 11:19:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF4B5EC020; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 11:19:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <255AA67B-9367-48EA-96B8-466570B083AB@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B2CD49B4-4D16-411A-917E-371DB91AC8F3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2022 11:19:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+F-oop9Cvo7nNF-O86vvJhNVrNs2AdBytnith3+JzGCdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
To: "tjw.ietf@gmail.com" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+Fch-C8LPCEHkouRxCnkMcpMeh7bmQRPTXRwodx01xWNw@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+F-oop9Cvo7nNF-O86vvJhNVrNs2AdBytnith3+JzGCdQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pjWv2AUqtq5yfpiMQfjkr6aAjtI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2022 16:19:14 -0000
Tim: I looked at the diff between draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis and RFC 5933. The changes seems reasonable to me. Russ > On Feb 1, 2022, at 3:35 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > All > > We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG unless there are folks saying they feel it is ready to be published. > > Thanks > > tim > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > All > > With draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons now in AUTH48 state, it's time to move this document along as well. > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis, > "Use of GOST 2012 Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC" > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-07.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-07.html> > > The Current Intended Status of this document is: Informational > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. > If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. > If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with your reasons. > > Because of the American holiday, we're going to run the last call process a few days long. This Working Group Last Call will end on: 10 December 2021 > > thanks > tim > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dn… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draft-ie… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draf… Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call fo… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call fo… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call fo… Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call fo… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draf… Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draf… Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draf… Paul Wouters