IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] on private use TLDS

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 26 November 2019 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694311208B5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:12:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIiPFpCk7XRa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45C01208B1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id h15so15771414qka.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:12:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=86UR1KO5iGDzc7dIRzpDb6uDEu1kuZkEY2c20nGQUAw=; b=Z+JtDoVwCAB6hBEB5aNEyNQHozXaeAGxiRtRu6GD1Qi9qdjIoCnNHqzqpQOsapi7i/ Y8Q/211hdVY+8r2PdayBlnUEU5BOCpZXhD84KP3BGr+ni0lV1iueztmX/kBsYwHkxpsB ZjgEXqadyFPIDLAgJ/x2d+trRG1EWi/76L70sHORNI2qSyZtOTv6OtnIi5ds/ZzT9HYf l3neZsCTlWSKxiJVezZaSwJxywg2PVvXYUZAWo8h3fpU/UyYRbXoL4RotHoGPMWV3hho 5awtB+H0m30cTe5wl6sQh46E1sGvhMtkWlQ23sSlhX8ZlBqTz2QUiaWtk6k671ELzaAQ ZPZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=86UR1KO5iGDzc7dIRzpDb6uDEu1kuZkEY2c20nGQUAw=; b=SoIdtdNZkDm/1oensHUnffNo+YsHIcYFtwloOhdZj9JgHvZxLvZKOOzLvi9vDcZWQW xxa5UT+48j6kHwej7bqhToHiqXqnTass1mrGC3rGcmCAkJi/Hw1QCarLELdZzhKHd/C7 d55uJUEplIPqPZBtANSR/QyWh0294sjtuTDlPwcd4mfOZLzxWIHj3avEr21D3Q2Ndeqp 9DAIxd07V/1Y9esN3YE0zlj4MGVO2GpdgxTLXuB/RfW7B3y5kaF1xIdSfNUw8mOvQZgl 0N0A5R5dPXyAMIW846bJk+OCRtvUtyvSfNdz/5aBdnrBdcHMRfIuSu7bf7UusQV7CycZ o23w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfiuPrfqfGn8EdzB8QX1Lj0u3S81sfTeqevvekOLFaahR3cVHv 9zu7sny8ZD77K9PYnbcOVF65zvFsSaGSFvt7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxoMN1OhK+vafBOMYPfc/Ar0losdxQxzIFTBnwoFSHHIsCxcB2aorpIl1lwatFohv4+gFrYLQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f50a:: with SMTP id o10mr31422653qkg.143.1574770373782; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.47.61.47] (47-236.dc.icann.org. [192.0.47.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 11sm5671266qtx.45.2019.11.26.04.12.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:12:52 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8EEBBA34-91E7-4A6A-9AD9-51AD62D5BAE2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <A3430DBF-949A-4A66-A83F-A602C6F69560@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:12:49 +0100
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailbutler-Message-Id: 564C7E8E-7B54-4905-B4C7-A158817B45BE
Message-Id: <B428A2AF-9703-4DDA-8E34-60008FC9625C@virtualized.org>
References: <B679F326-54A0-4010-BD41-F2F317417169@dnss.ec> <A3430DBF-949A-4A66-A83F-A602C6F69560@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/prmcumlciZzzoadRJvZiGRg2S08>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] on private use TLDS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:12:56 -0000

On Nov 26, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> It might be worth clarifying what the actual scope of this proposal is.  I think that the idea is to say “look, if you want to use a private name, these names are known to be safe.”   It’s not to say “the IETF hereby declares that the following names are safe,” but rather “the IETF is reporting that these names have been declared safe by this other SDO.”
> 
> The point of making this recommendation is that we know that people will have reasons to privately use domains that have not been allocated to them out of the global namespace, and we’ve seen the problems that such private allocations cause when they are done in an unsafe manner.  The advice here is on how to avoid making that mistake.   It’s not a TLD allocation by IETF: those TLDs are already effectively allocated.
> 
> Is that about right?

Exactly (at least from my perspective).

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email