Re: [DNSOP] Lameness, registries, and enforcement was Re: [Ext] Lameness terminology (was: Status of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis)
Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Fri, 04 May 2018 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B441A12426E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2018 07:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YlgEsEorvfVh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2018 07:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9899120454 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2018 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a3so14178003uad.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 May 2018 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ZILA+0f7euIP8RB3rrX419/um3zN+Fs13yXCwlw+RmU=; b=Rfq9ij/6ou2g4DGhoOeboF0aSA7DbRXiSheBwyQxn2lG6JwCPkSNSAuXQ+PiJInDsz qm4fToeHMMjhmk/1VUzpz8KLfXRsFRFmUdJ1qKaXlcUCRhSgct7Uq09lA7pSnormqbSZ uEVcmgHmU2zc92C/s1GG2shfPErl2G1AVYrgI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ZILA+0f7euIP8RB3rrX419/um3zN+Fs13yXCwlw+RmU=; b=OknVHOCvUNtldjbRzzqM4g9kuEG8QBjpYIbe5yQg8DbdnNcxodrNncs8lYJikhun/t 5r0GjHqCJ8874IsjKfZwT9oxn0fXscFu7GYnlSeQGuoi/uJeQdbBkSicw5IR9QLRqYtu Q/9KhTIGJw4ibWsZVJgTJGtA6OGwWv6uyNlrSrZTFl7aM60pahWIhpMSbR2348BK6fcG XyInnnRMkW5NNHWa0/zgFMMYJAsMWe0YppCQAifBHJcErjsUi+RayrcLkAuV50GLQmdL dssDvyCfiWXM8uUVO2BeSoLVcnhzME04D/Yi/x6i3Lv8EXVDcp8HPuCo2VK38bDhOOSd jM5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBnVBrJ2ormZt2M+Y3w1fqZIZZLh4sOaQrV0KtHWieqGxcHkZZU SEVieyAEFJKrXguNA+966fwU3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoyWNJYVgR6EcgleTogsP5O7EoPSAlZMfSI6M8JW7m/KhJ/4t4EDWvGYzAya45XoqWGOsUH0A==
X-Received: by 10.176.6.170 with SMTP id g39mr24369969uag.82.1525444106979; Fri, 04 May 2018 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [199.212.90.48] (23-233-21-69.cpe.pppoe.ca. [23.233.21.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d21-v6sm5369234vke.22.2018.05.04.07.28.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 May 2018 07:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Message-Id: <EB4633AA-251D-4C2C-A647-F069B32ED610@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FAC33142-439B-4D6A-8E5F-7F4552C0075C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 10:28:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <7D86D474-C9D3-4EF7-8CD2-B8FBD2129217@hopcount.ca>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, David Huberman <david.huberman@icann.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
To: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <53696FE1-9E92-4CC8-8A54-5AF5F4251590@icann.org> <7D86D474-C9D3-4EF7-8CD2-B8FBD2129217@hopcount.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/q6U3tNSITtFBVqeq0z4bSM44G60>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Lameness, registries, and enforcement was Re: [Ext] Lameness terminology (was: Status of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 14:28:30 -0000
On 4 May 2018, at 10:26, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote: > Following on from my previous comment Arrgh, which I sent from the wrong mailbox, and which consequently was held for moderation. Apparently I am not ready to use the Internet today. Joe