IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Fri, 21 February 2020 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C647B12022A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wq9A3j0bYAOi for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kmx5a.knipp.de (kmx5a.knipp.de [195.253.6.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA55120019 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:01:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-Recipient: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Original-Recipient: klaus.malorny@knipp.de
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx5a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48PCmK3cjYz4vvR; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:01:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [195.253.2.27] (mclane.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.27]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5073723C7; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:01:04 +0100 (MEZ)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de> <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com> <3ead518d-f166-1c36-c3e9-18aeb355d160@pletterpet.nl> <57323a0d-6d33-ceef-1e99-58d61eff16dd@knipp.de> <041cf7a9-be2b-18bd-7f76-edbae5cd1e4b@NLnetLabs.nl> <57505938-340A-4594-A283-EF670BD1B47E@isoc.org> <48d82bb1-81ff-6e25-b060-5a2b9ac7791f@knipp.de> <581e6821-0114-5647-5733-e5c7b6be332e@nic.cz>
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Message-ID: <15ed82d1-6923-7813-4077-dd812eeb2410@knipp.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:01:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/75.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <581e6821-0114-5647-5733-e5c7b6be332e@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: kmx5a.knipp.de; none
X-Rspamd-Server: v1117
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48PCmK3cjYz4vvR
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8391, ipnet:195.253.0.0/16, country:DE]; LOCAL_WL_IP(0.00)[195.253.2.54]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/q8R6EAXJnGuY-KIqAUVI5VL4kak>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:01:09 -0000

On 21.02.20 14:44, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 2/21/20 2:23 PM, Klaus Malorny wrote:
> My understanding of the plan is that for fallbacks we'll have what
> people are using now, e.g. that http redirect.  Perhaps you can
> elaborate on why that doesn't seem sufficient.
> 

Hi Vladimir,

simply that I want to get rid of it. IMHO one aim of a new technology should be 
to make old technology obsolete, esp. such workarounds. If I have to keep them 
(forever?), where is the benefit (for me as a company)?

Regards,

Klaus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email