Re: [DNSOP] [[e-mail]: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

[Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]>]

On 12/6/13 4:29 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> Convincing all existing users (e.g .local) to move under the new
>> labor (e.g local.alt) is probably a non-starter, but perhaps things
>> like .bit, and new things may do so…
> OK, then someone has to write a RFC6761-style Internet-Draft
> describing .alt, reserving it and doing so before too many new
> proposals pop up (because, once a name is used, it is almost
> impossible to change it). Any volunteer? (Not me, because I think that
> registering .alt will be as much effort as registering .anything, so
> it is pointless.)
>

I agree with Stephane something should be written to at least put it 
into digital print, though I also agree with him there is windmill 
tilting effect involved as well.

Any volunteers? Put your hand down Warren,  we have enough on your plate 
at this time (though I can assist if no one steps forward and/or 
everyone finds it a bad idea).

tim