IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 31 July 2018 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BCA130DD6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgdXNeUYoAOc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497971271FF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n6-v6so17440167qtl.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=gRPX7wYgoiGzUmz7sDrFPKJ2tXHFCojUFcT1PWdGX2I=; b=qSNVk+92+Mt/wSZlbi8sT9OGzpVkZo/6DDLe4X5LCP7Ko8FCldcmVF0F+r74ExJR5O 7UtTbe1WaJW3S5qWMIzlyfAkWgWdTYc6adTuZqWAxRO/DjF4A1lcELnkyptkt+/vKNcN KuePzsEwC79dBSOamPj/FriCeQbq/H/kq2jVxnc27b9wa4RNRZ6aB7KIvdMw8fA4mRZP +1IuVo9FJxMQux4Vlsn7qlsJixnlvV/nJqUqifH1wZOVxy4Lm4c8YXjAQKRZkt5pQZJC XyrCIqI6NyZ6ASF20a8G9JUoUB3XXlvu7BFvaTqAg370BrIl5eKRw6tJWRoRUvpzj1Pt j3jg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=gRPX7wYgoiGzUmz7sDrFPKJ2tXHFCojUFcT1PWdGX2I=; b=Ns+n2paQggtokGMVf0WUFXfb7cZl0AdsKEcX74Z4luEGgQf8RZIl6wNOwkfPjsCly5 Z+pps++C3Sxbl7lV65Mst2Ei/SLMlmOEgkUgMI9WpaTlgfg5u+nCkbfaJNfYAVe0u/dH LLebLj6jGEk7+pchcfhLUxAWD3Zg5225Dlo5IwTkTQVzzpJKHyQ1/Zm/l2qKZss4XZa7 k+kg7DjMjV1iI62j2nQRF3gA0r6gO+lLywIOP0FfljaEt1YxrXtExDmSadyLbvA3Rvg/ aZKQdTgkTAD/p6eUNrTesj87GDc8mN83OshBFtjlpr/LYalEVSEAZ3TRUYYZrJA90F7p wqAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGNkxyEuJelt5z3mJq1rllUFOXgGrnF68ZHftYC7bkHu/4YsIDr w7fQQl/hD6YBbxX6+fMA5Npb3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfyLVJmKWSltn4bcGsIMwRKOeOa0eSkJiXzr4TvsDBVCBkaHxv1ac3OZRHG6dKeCmzA7e8Ieg==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c176:: with SMTP id i51-v6mr20705078qvh.40.1533068169463; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.12] (c-73-167-89-221.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.89.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m129-v6sm11366731qkb.8.2018.07.31.13.16.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <4071D372-2092-4CEF-B105-A5205F28EF43@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C4D052F8-BB28-4268-A843-86DAFE531E40"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.17\))
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:16:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <C2528F63-6B39-4E50-92E6-B089E776BA3F@bangj.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal@ietf.org
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
References: <153270509617.32757.1191915890190419981.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EFFB4DC5-5A4B-4EAB-8B9F-56229080CDF0@bangj.com> <C2528F63-6B39-4E50-92E6-B089E776BA3F@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qDdWjdiLA9tTmts83jjQlwMunMo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:16:12 -0000

On Jul 31, 2018, at 4:14 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
> My co-authors reminded me about the TCP framing for DNS which gives the length of the DNS message so it can easily be skipped so this isn’t a problem.

And just as an additional data point, I just now pointed my DNSSD Discovery Relay implementation at BIND 9, and BIND 9 returned "Not Implemented" as expected, and did not drop the connection.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email