[DNSOP] More for the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 26 May 2015 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5881A8F33 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.353
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wyjP0g0pWm-V for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0391AC3D8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (142-254-17-100.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t4QFeOj5032747 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:40:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 142-254-17-100.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.100] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <905B446A-CACE-46A1-8575-5F0DE34D9022@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:40:23 -0700
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qIkPwUwNHmIBFF-_cdqdP1YPpI8>
Subject: [DNSOP] More for the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:41:20 -0000

Greetings again, and apologies for the long lag on getting the new draft out. It has a *lot* of changes based on what we heard in the WG Last Call, and we need to be sure that we haven't messed anything up in the changes. Please review the diffs here:
   https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-02

Many of those diffs are just a change to make it clear where one definition stops and when another begins with better indentation, but many of them are new definitions or clarifications. Thus, a careful read is important to us.

We also have three outstanding questions from the earlier review:

1) Possibly add back in NXDOMAIN?

2) Remove "Child-centric resolver" ?

3) Add: DNS operator: an entity responsible for running DNS servers. For a zone's authoritative
servers, the registrant may act as their own DNS operator, or their registrar may do it on
their behalf, or they may use a third-party operator.

If we do (1), we need to have full agreement on what it is, and I don't think we can get that in a short period of time. I think (2) should be done because it isn't needed for the rest of the document, and can be added in a -bis document. The addition for (3) seemed to have good support, but we need to be sure.

--Paul Hoffman