Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http

["Paul Hoffman" <[e-mail]>]

Folks, this is a call for WG adoption, not a design exercise. If the WG 
adopts the document, we will have plenty of opportunity to fine-tune or 
make major changes. Such as:


On 12 Jul 2016, at 11:51, Shane Kerr wrote:

> I recognize that HTTP/2 is definitely a better option because of
> out-of-order replies, but I worry about requiring it. It's still quite
> new and language support may be spotty. But I guess given it's
> popularity this shouldn't be a huge problem, so maybe that is a
> reasonable recommendation.

If this WG adopts the document and then says "but we want to use an 
older version of the HTTP protocol", we should expect a fair amount of 
push-back during IETF Last Call.

--Paul Hoffman