IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 18 June 2020 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AC23A0CCF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4WA3RLvyA8f for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9003A0CCC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49nnBJ2kY0zMvk; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:16:40 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1592497000; bh=RxlmjSa3s9chFnd3EunbbXZSXeqTvRcgNcROb4VhO2U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=CZwPI/iQCjGA4Myxza/PxTcpV9I9ObF6+PvIyVfJnVCjbIKACynwZjyD4S3GssX/4 nWRh1lef6bEJ4xDDSOfO0BVLuu4jFRzATXT7dWgMpnJONErzXwNWIPvaDdGcB5qL+P GpwwCaRt2Ex39DeH6xlj+kA4ekRBidvNja4Rk5WA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrfHS70JJAho; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:16:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:16:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF9A56020D8B; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:16:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE61C66A7A; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:16:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:16:37 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7269525A-5376-48AA-B9DC-84BE9D84BA36@icann.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.22.394.2006181214420.20534@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+H4713BnZDntTuVW0FrO59zZ9NFJ=J=n9JFFq2zmfy2pQ@mail.gmail.com> <A930F8C6-9C33-4933-AC37-579ACEF5B325@ogud.com> <7FF83D52-F20B-4FF2-82AA-416835FCA5F4@isc.org> <CADqLbzJsJ6etv-eZuabLsMO4g+XYgktgpuP-fTNSi1cFTwdOGg@mail.gmail.com> <68eb8413-8704-40a3-9765-7eb19ebd0e78@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBORz-ustvXvrYaMm15rAHUfA3zR8Sr3ZscLWB6YJ6-s8w@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EOcTWX6PrbQUmqM6=Z442bE7itFAG6No0b9MZdcARbOg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOwxO6=Qpoyk=_cDsP5G__3CfjKV8p+boGY4-9OX=Gh8w@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Ge7AmGKT3PZ9SQDkHWi9315T=xbLcx4vQ23e=4T=zmNg@mail.gmail.com> <C2C9BDB4-AA7B-47B8-8735-2A529B37B4BA@icann.org> <CADqLbzLdu-ceWDKk5aUYTe3WzAntJKh5QTncHyy137W=nyDSfQ@mail.gmail.com> <7269525A-5376-48AA-B9DC-84BE9D84BA36@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qeQ1N6qGKXjINfPnnjFtIJtdHfY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:16:51 -0000

On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On Jun 18, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The 2nd registry
>> Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR) Type Digest Algorithms
>> (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml#ds-rr-types-1 <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml#ds-rr-types-1>)
>> has the "Standards Action" update policy
>
> I had forgotten that the DS registry is "standards action". This document shows why that was a bad idea.
>
> It might be better, and faster, for this WG to adopt a one-paragraph draft that makes the DS registry "RFC required", like the other DNSSEC-related registries.

I agree.

However, whether it is faster for the document, I don't know. The ISE
stream is currently very slow moving. Perhaps these documents could
flow faster than the two other ISE stream ones I am I'm tracking.

I'm fine with the RFCs being standard track.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email