Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 02 May 2017 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D378129B0F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7ymfb8GfNkB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A6012946D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.88.69.21] (unknown [216.168.230.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C249C61F9E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:16:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5908DAF9.90802@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 12:16:09 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.12 (Windows/20170323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <148960242305.14237.6433299035570274359@ietfa.amsl.com> <D4EF170B.700A9%lee@asgard.org> <m1coTAQ-0000EXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <D52E454B.7AA2D%lee@asgard.org>
In-Reply-To: <D52E454B.7AA2D%lee@asgard.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qp5yRLdp-eJ5S34giv0zlt1GVYw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 19:18:52 -0000


Lee Howard wrote:
> 
> On 3/16/17, 7:02 AM, "Philip Homburg" <pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com on
> behalf of pch-dnsop-1@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
>> In my experience, without reverse DNS it is essentially impossible to have
>> mail delivered to the internet at large.
> 
> Yes.

since this isn't an ideal or intended state of affairs, let's consider
the size and shape of the box, not just what's in there.

http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110607_two_stage_filtering_for_ipv6_electronic_mail/

-- 
P Vixie