[DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Fri, 30 October 2015 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C901B391E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFG46w5GEH9s for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF68C1B391F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ( by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:23:25 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:23:25 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft -domain-names-01
Thread-Index: AQHREwVkl+Abwf0rI0iIbqxdzTcepw==
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:23:24 +0000
Message-ID: <D258CB42.108E9%edward.lewis@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3529034562_4866951"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qtizxUeGnl_WO_l8DTrYjmL7ors>
Subject: [DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:23:29 -0000

A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I
think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG.  I
updated the document and resubmitted.  FWIW, this is the document link:

I'm not even asking for comment on the list (but you can if you want).
When I rev'd the document, I didn't mention it on this list (until now).

What I'm asking for is - when in Yokohama, if you have an interest in this
I'm willing to discuss.

The issue in the document is both internal to DNS and external to DNS, I'm
looking for broader input (such as applications area topics).