[DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 16 April 2025 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31091CDF7D8; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8pjXhr3HXIc; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C131CDF7D4; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.225.106.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 53G9Mo3X012140 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1744795402; x=1744881802; i=@elandsys.com; bh=kyG8YfGIeiGVsODQNCSqFdezy+/1Ek3OlgAW68g9CS0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=H9uILPCO7u1DwJ1wkZEkcoVqWVGLTTV2isrBeiJ45BwURx+OaD0MNeOlJzrC31coU t7AOMzA8vgs4Ug3kNLmzyLLig5gGYlqh4wXfR11QhZKUV9PqIpA2TdA0jimloqf5cb S79V9Y0sJPfiJncRZioVWNPtCxZQQtkN1qaaKECM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20250416014615.098fac70@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:19:56 -0700
To: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>, dnsop@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <a7220ba0-5e8c-4273-a353-c8371ea23c50@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <a7220ba0-5e8c-4273-a353-c8371ea23c50@NLnetLabs.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: 47AHF7LNYOSID37SPQUNCJPGU4KG7K5R
X-Message-ID-Hash: 47AHF7LNYOSID37SPQUNCJPGU4KG7K5R
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qu1qgjI31g9f6uuWfinMJis8hhs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Benno
At 01:38 AM 15-04-2025, Benno Overeinder wrote:
>At IETF 122, there appeared to be some agreement to adopt this work 
>within DNSOP.
>
>Below are the relevant meeting minutes and a link to the 
>presentation from the session:

Thanks for providing the relevant information from the minutes.

>This email begins a Call for Adoption for draft-davies-internal-tld, 
>"A Top-level Domain for Private Use."

"The IAB/IETF did not voice any objection to the ICANN Board 
permanently reserving a top-level string according to the ICANN Board 
minutes for the meeting dated 24 July 2024.  The expectation of the 
IETF Chair and the IAB Chair was that the string be reserved within 
the IANA-managed reserved domain registry rather than the special-use 
domain names registry.  There is an editor note in Section 4 of 
draft-davies-internal-tld-03 which states that: "It not yet decided 
if the "internal" top-level domain should be added to the list of 
special-use domain names".  The positions taken are somewhat contradictory.

I don't have a strong opinion on whether draft-davies-internal-tld 
should be adopted or not.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy