Re: [DNSOP] 答复: 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 28 January 2019 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402B012D4EC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:32:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yoBK6ON7leOG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5821712D4E9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:32:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:58624) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1go591-000iww-dL (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:32:03 +0000
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:32:03 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: "Davey Song(宋林健)" <ljsong@biigroup.cn>
cc: 'Brian Dickson' <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, dnsop@ietf.org, 'Peter van Dijk' <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, 'Ralf Weber' <dns@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <00b001d4b524$bbf67b90$33e372b0$@cn>+9EC122293683EBC1
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901281125400.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <BCACF554-8BE6-49BC-B75A-BCED776F5189@NLnetLabs.nl> <4A75C4E3-F74F-46DB-9A8A-879C0BB79190@powerdns.com> <52CC68F4-231A-4002-A615-12F2F044342E@isc.org> <533234C8-A97C-4AA3-8395-0708909444B0@rfc1035.com> <595ae5ba-d92c-5d4d-d62b-293a343bf69b@nic.cz> <5c46d965.1c69fb81.5b50.dcd6SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CAH1iCiqHYqh_1vMJkQ5-qMxDatccv7hmLeUps8DwDRpXFY-XWA@mail.gmail.com> <00b001d4b524$bbf67b90$33e372b0$@cn>+9EC122293683EBC1
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-1170307109-1548675123=:13313"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qx1Y5tFIT0Ks8qRd5hRMC24psYc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] 答复: 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:32:08 -0000

Davey Song(宋林健) <ljsong@biigroup.cn> wrote:
>
> >(2) Have you experimented with setting EDNS0 UDP bufsize to the *actual
> >max size* that IPv6 allows *without fragmenting* (or MTU?), and what
> >happens when you do that?
>
> It require resolvers' change to set EDNS0 bufsize below a certain number.

Or for authoritative servers to set their maximum UDP response size
small enough.

Fragmentation in the DNS can be reduced by either the initiator or the
responder without co-operation from the other end. There's a good chance
we can reduce the problem substantially just by changing the defaults and
waiting for people to upgrade, even if there are lots of unmaintained
servers.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
defend the right to speak, write, worship, associate, and vote freely