Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <> Wed, 05 July 2017 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B75F131D9E; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vq8LhQOCIu5; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F58131442; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f194so15666991yba.3; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 11:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=utIfKahTTGf6e8CmH6+Nk717kCKioY75abtfTMUFgyQ=; b=LzhiVyveg50I+RN0cfpcYjv4baseZuUCd2M8fHQeUbk/8R06YYNLoq5a2kHkEfC5jU nUbjLle1HIYZVX0kr9No/7P0lqt4AvD9NHrIfArjF7aktqoB0Lka90/u1BgZ02t71Z8T DWKYNfSQ0WGEZXpOuoG/TmdfU3IjpwDsmd4DfK8JtbYx4Ke+54TQp3ZK/6Emzx8abuh7 ouGkC9Jld24QERZ23lafQvFP8GPbT2SkJz7ejUOM8Hv4pIGW1ZmUzfWeN9Hc4sm/T4ST ou9wzDq2/OOmEvKxsax8aBNoMAo2gQnDrhR3h0Y/wou8DrAH8AABf8y6/8m+6BT15ArC gklg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=utIfKahTTGf6e8CmH6+Nk717kCKioY75abtfTMUFgyQ=; b=P8w/7M43M//Tkbrb+vd+kuzH/5AFZGWYtgAVoWTroDHDataQ3oNeSqnxJnSRpSAQgn v6wCMzWQHpOX5MpRvay9aaYguiuHzNPfL6drbaxuR/eDMWkKxSpfJYnTHK9icffmy/WQ H9Z0Ni3t6Zn+vwOsLCBEbXI5hhszuk7ccBva8DDIvtffZuSTY+gV55ObafZSlQiouvL8 luIOAEug/ewI2ZezBgwmBzPLe6LoNHxYu4rn6+SKUFnlfSoBRDPKFfQI6w8GqQ6pS+X5 RczMzFvch74RTXMwN+jVdsrPPpL8vy3Vr89Xdsvc90lj2zfhowkl76UV+ZmlWY+pyQi3 lpow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113+Bcab80GrkNRmoS1T3JIAx/6ohSG0zSu2OYJEgmUkCdm/pBQX M1dchF86cLbF4hgl1qY6a05sSBplRQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id n69mr3365444ybf.83.1499279866431; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 11:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:37:46 -0500
Message-ID: <>
To: Ted Lemon <>
Cc: The IESG <>,, Suzanne Woolf <>, dnsop-chairs <>, " WG" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c07dd7adb8fe20553964b3f"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 18:37:49 -0000

Hi, Ted,

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon <> wrote:

> Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point
> this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct.   It is
> claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist.   I do
> not agree that all the problems listed are problems, nor I think does
> anyone else.   If that's not clear in the document, that's probably worth
> correcting.

I think my comments are more likely to be unclear than the way the document
describes the problem set. What you said, is what I think the document says.

I'm mostly sending comments about specific points that the document makes,
that I think I understand at a surface level, but I don't think I
understand the implications in a few cases, so, that's what I included in
my ballot.

I think the document is clear enough on "claimed to be the list of problems
that people have asserted exist", and even if I didn't think that was a
fine basis for this document, I wouldn't dream of suggesting that the
authors change the criteria for what's included.