[DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption for draft-sheth-dns-integration

[Jody Kolker <[e-mail]>]

I also support the adoption of this document.  Of particular interest to me is section 4.1 Domain Name Lifecycle.  We have seen a significant amount of fraud related to previously registered domains that have been used in other social media apps.

Thanks,
Jody Kolker
319-329-9805  (mobile)
 
Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney ([e-mail]) with any feedback.

This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Housley <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:16 PM
To: Ondřej Surý <[e-mail]>
Cc: dnsop <[e-mail]>; Joe Abley <[e-mail]>
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption for draft-sheth-dns-integration

I like this document, and I think that DNSOP should adopt it.

To address Joes concern about breadth of review, I think that the DNSOP WH Chairs should ask for early ARTART and SecDir review as soon as the document is adopted.  At least that will get some additional perspectives to look at it.

Russ


> On May 28, 2025, at 9:18 AM, Joe Abley <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ondrej,
> 
> On 28 May 2025, at 14:37, Ondřej Surý <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> The draft is available here: 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheth-dns-integration/
>> 
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for 
>> adoption by DNSOP, and send any comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>> 
>> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
> 
> This is the first time I have looked at this document, which surely means I have not been paying attention, and which I mention just to give context to the following.
> 
> I think this document's audience is not what is described in section 1.1. I think the intended audience in fact is application and service designers who are thinking about incorporating features of the namespace used by the DNS into what they are building.
> 
> I wonder whether dnsop is the best place for that audience to provide input and review. Maybe there's somewhere in the application area that would be a better venue. This working group (and other groups like the DNS directorate) could still provide meaningful review of a document that is worked on elsewhere.
> 
> This is not particularly an objection to adoption, just a question of whether this is the best place for it.
> 
> 
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]