IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] on private use TLDS

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Fri, 29 November 2019 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462B21200C1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FsntpKXEMUy1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D04C1200B7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s71so24573255oih.11 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4BuF+MZiSS6cF4HMR+EGKMI5pMDPq881RqdP5ywQoO4=; b=Xem5pTChmfA6Z8urnw6o2F/C6yofPzWffWHxddc4IBhyNjvoY2Lwk5C3eRumSd5Wjo baNtrEIF+rbmV3HBstaEis73L+z7q3rCXyEyX1EZ7j5z8yZNzMDbkeTeSCOM7p+dBpfI VtDhbdttGAEzHo4kwJODjFzcl0cI9ErdQ0Gns=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4BuF+MZiSS6cF4HMR+EGKMI5pMDPq881RqdP5ywQoO4=; b=TxZvNaERVYJeGDHPP4pteamxhk3PlstoDJfCPD1yiafG4TFDOCq66Ea0O+WH78uNc2 JYL2tEXDSTmJsSTo+RoPvQcmkukQXTXz0wPrOWE2Qfp7aWTQyGHGa1r3yl0m9gTPMGZl VPUJWFiYw2HizUFjFC74L+UVnLE5TIsGXpBwIdPe13oSkKA5NeJxIGK7cDrcfxgPKAjo qLYlPVXi64lgLClJn+5d0iUG3hT8sLtVdPQs6TfQ2+nHSaeoi8vsrSXl4Bb5yxP1NhJe r2sA9x1O4wZC4Kn4pV14cDRgeqz/UvQATIgNNtLkE21DBOdPa2iHvmZM6I91up7ob4Os E8Aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlwcY9Yv7sOwdIlfRERNKVJ68YUdkdzQJUz+ZAjLgskdKQGEM4 wP04zEBS2NLJa/doCk9TrwHjJUi+TmZ6UMlkUagw4g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2WQ/2/F90ce2Gm4qFZG0th+WLpkg0NCt6lWQEsqkx+l7bi/MDmAFizAptUbqIQmhq5QpOq6N3CtrS4ScZK58=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4105:: with SMTP id l5mr10412596oic.135.1574987059276; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:18 -0800
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
References: <8796ca33-41a7-85f8-0afe-dbe8666f431b@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <8796ca33-41a7-85f8-0afe-dbe8666f431b@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:24:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJhMdTPOx1DMMcG1GvqtaFhg0ngg_qEkLhGhHjyXbcmcwg2=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/rPNRpFIuMWygZqlm6BrerKL-er4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] on private use TLDS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:24:21 -0000

On Nov 28, 2019, at 19:07, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:

> Can you please explain why ICANN's work on name collision and the ongoing onslaught of queries at the root for un-delegated TLDs are not sufficient evidence?

If it's not obvious from the questions I asked, then perhaps not.

> And if not, how do you propose that we study it?

By avoiding words like "onslaught" and building substantiated
conclusions from data.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email