IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Thu, 05 November 2015 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757111B2B97 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:26:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4fNuFocNqaF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:26:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF4D1B2B96 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:26:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i121-112-35-81.s41.a014.ap.plala.or.jp ([121.112.35.81]:58735 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1ZuKYd-0003wn-8g (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:26:27 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <1E5B644E-EA0D-4287-8AB5-1907EE06BE1C@hopcount.ca>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <563B58FE.50905@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 22:26:22 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1E5B644E-EA0D-4287-8AB5-1907EE06BE1C@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/rQcnO_hcamTbDVQl0kHqGuCClvU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:26:31 -0000


On 05/11/2015 11:37, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I couldn't quite interpret the questions and hums in the room; was the
> consensus
> 
> (a) this clarification is not needed; the existing spec is clear enough, or
> 
> (b) a clarification might be useful, but the proposed clarification in
> the document is wrong, or
> 
> (c) something else?
> 
> If it's (b), I could collect more of the kinds of insights that were
> provided at the mic and update the proposal.
> 
> If it's (a), I can happily just shut up about and move on with other
> things :-)

IMHO, if a clarification is needed, it's that a client that depends on
the order of the RRsets in an answer MUST NOT do so.

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email