Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems
"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Tue, 06 November 2018 13:58 UTC
Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BDA130DEC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:58:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t7yDVqmCfvvK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF9812D4F1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [169.254.123.86] (vpn-client-208.netnod.se [192.71.80.208]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC503233DE; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:58:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1541512728; bh=3Zlhaz2W/PrtjGDWN0oEEZkM6toa1F7PNqwS81DYxxk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iMwtZ71PHjxN6VtOMDx+Zj87ZuvkEUgim6CQRDpcEX5QF5OHFEzt4MST6cdfp34BJ TsYd7SfYBuGBrPSZTPZpvQPtVQimpughyMajYGr3AS9jSUcf2vAOFffMuUJs31pB+B D4a2RktJd/E5qi3Y+xR1iyDLZpdmsKsqIeF4qM48=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, dnsop@ietf.org, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:58:45 +0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.1r5552)
Message-ID: <8E469ACD-3E5D-41C7-BE2D-A20A82FA8421@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <CAJhMdTO+tRhyUhArcNUhxqvkCXKCSBfF_-Ts+7WSOV8Qf_ToEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH1iCirXYsYB3sAo8f1Jy-q4meLmQAPSFO-7x5idDufdT_unXQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811021543210.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20181105083526.GA12204@besserwisser.org> <7704C350-256A-42E3-B718-38FD449A2ADE@hopcount.ca> <770d5dc8-b8a3-c1c3-553f-0e9504389750@bellis.me.uk> <CAJhMdTODiJ7DvN5=sFnvEj-FP=M=2yDN_enk17Bo=En9V8bLjw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811061338450.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAJhMdTO+tRhyUhArcNUhxqvkCXKCSBfF_-Ts+7WSOV8Qf_ToEg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_1E1C30C3-DEFC-431A-9112-FC6BFD415820_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/rVNgrKqfw2D8ch1pha1KUQpsrqo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:58:54 -0000
On 6 Nov 2018, at 17:51, Joe Abley wrote: >> On Nov 6, 2018, at 20:44, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote: >> >> Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote: >>> >>> Specifically, I s the wildcard owner name a real problem in the grand >>> scheme of things? >> >> My understanding is that wildcards don't work for SRV because the >> _prefixes are used to disambiguate which service you are asking for, >> effectively to extend the RR TYPE number space. So if you wildcard a SRV >> record then the target port has to support every possible protocol :-) > > Right, but my point was that wildcard owner names aren't seen at the apex, so a solution to the problem of what to do at the apex doesn't need to worry about them. > > Ray has wider aspirations than just the apex. This may well be sensible, but I think it's worth calling out the scope creep. We should also remember that there is a different goal as well, and that is to be able to delegate the zone within which "the records dealing with web" is managed so that the administrative responsibility is separated between the one which run the zone for example.com and the ones that run for _http._tcp.example.com (or _tcp.example.com). Patrik
- [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Erik Nygren
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Christian Huitema
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Ebersman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Ebersman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- [DNSOP] CNAME at apex - a website publisher persp… Dan York
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems manu tman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Ebersman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Olli Vanhoja
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Thomas Peterson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Dan York
- [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray converg… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Michael J. Sheldon
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… tjw ietf
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Kevin Darcy
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Thomas Peterson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tim Wicinski