Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc

I support adoption of this document—although I agree that the names do need some bike shedding if/when it is adopted! This is a good mechanism to use for ESNI keys and Alt-Svc. I also think that the extensibility it provides is important property (for example, I am proposing to use it for designating encrypted DNS servers in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-dprive-adaptive-dns-privacy). 

I am also willing to contribute text and review the document.

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Oct 7, 2019, at 7:37 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> All
> 
> We want to thank the authors for working on this.  The chairs
> feel that part of the discussion around this document would be to
> resolve:
>   - ANAME/HTTPSSVC possible overlaps
>   - The RR Type Name (no one seems to be in love with current names)
> 
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc
> 
> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc/>
> 
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> 
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
> 
> This call for adoption ends: 21 October 2019
> 
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop