Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)

Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org> Sun, 16 February 2014 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@grothoff.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02AF1A0081 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:03:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6FRK6EoqtXW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD921A002C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (pd95c0f92.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.92.15.146]) by mail.net.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDADF188E03C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:03:05 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5300E136.5070901@grothoff.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:03:02 +0100
From: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CAESS1RPh+UK+r=JzZ9nE_DUqcvNtZiS6TNt1CDN-C0uiU7HP=A@mail.gmail.com> <52FEF407.30405@redbarn.org> <20140215140133.GA6990@sources.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca> <D82F49E8-9A06-4F52-8E3E-DF5C8D0B7549@virtualized.org> <53006595.5010207@frobbit.se> <784CF51A-937B-4131-85BC-AED579FA746D@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <784CF51A-937B-4131-85BC-AED579FA746D@vpnc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sH6ekBr3VfV0S8CBBbj6biTWCcM
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:03:12 -0000

On 02/16/2014 04:52 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Sorry, friend, but this is trolling. Or do you believe that DANE is not an innovation?

Well, I personally am not so sure that the delta to CERT records (RFC
4398) is all that big,
so is this really the best example you have? ;-).