[DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 07 March 2014 10:05 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30CB1A016A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:05:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndY9dLyHg64H for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82871A0164 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E762F2383F0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D209160060 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:06:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (dhcp-b59a.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.181.154]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBBD4160049 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F42810CD58F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 21:05:24 +1100 (EST)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:05:24 +1100
Message-Id: <20140307100524.2F42810CD58F@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sRfZqGCb6dCWO-McP44eJh4ST94
Subject: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:05:49 -0000
What do we expect CPE devices to implement to update parent zones. 100 different things to cover all the update methods registrar's come up with. Or do we say do exactly one method that works in all situations? We already have a problem today were they can't do dynamic update to every dynamic dns provider because they implement non standard adhoc methods rather that one standardised method. I know Registrars don't like to be told what to do but this is a case where interop from 100's of CPE providers and 1000000's of parent zones made up of RRR zones and non RRR zones needs to work reliably without lots of choice. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Wallstrom
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Wallstrom
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Paul Wouters