Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating infrastructure .INT domains

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 12 November 2021 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7233A08FE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tpqXiKXHTEok for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A80D3A08FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:27:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 63728 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2021 13:25:21 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 12 Nov 2021 13:25:21 -0000
Message-ID: <9376d93c-becb-b7a8-1602-adbecccae99a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 22:27:49 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <YY1G7mWZVJZkZZyx@KIDA-9190.local>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <YY1G7mWZVJZkZZyx@KIDA-9190.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/segHn36MGTx2kpEvbatZvLEaey4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating infrastructure .INT domains
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:28:03 -0000

Kim Davies wrote:

> Datatracker link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davies-int-historic/
> 
> It’s a short document, but at its heart we’ve identified the
> following domains that are referenced in places but seem to be obsolete:

That's fine. As the decision is made by IANA/ICANN, not IETF, it is
appropriate that the intended status is not BCP but informational.

But, abstract and introduction should make it explicit that it
is decided by IANA and/or ICANN. Merely stating "IANA shall" in
latter IANA considerations is too late and should confuse most
readers.

						Masataka Ohta