Re: [DNSOP] draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00 nit
Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 18 July 2016 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEC312DAB2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYXMK9uNZLVX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC1612DA2A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b14e.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.177.78]:52868) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1bPA7l-00088q-Tp (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:06:25 +0100
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAAiTEH9dP3kxhB6R8SJBwD7aJR0Jn=PrCpm7z_f0zE7JL=snLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <4529108e-4826-c2a0-485f-b934861c28d1@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:06:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH9dP3kxhB6R8SJBwD7aJR0Jn=PrCpm7z_f0zE7JL=snLw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sksNpPEnZ9r145owiTx1AuYDNug>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00 nit
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:25:03 -0000
On 18/07/2016 16:30, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > In § 5.3, the typecode registry leaves codes 3966 and 3967 undefined. > Thanks Matt. Ray
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00 … Ray Bellis
- [DNSOP] draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00 nit Matthew Pounsett