From nobody Mon Mar  7 10:07:34 2022
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FBA3A143C
 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  7 Mar 2022 10:07:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id gqAn8oCjmyoa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon,  7 Mar 2022 10:07:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460783A11AF
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon,  7 Mar 2022 10:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3])
 by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ADA6721E3E;
 Mon,  7 Mar 2022 10:06:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: =?utf-8?B?VmxhZGltw61yIMSMdW7DoXQ=?= <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>,  dnsop@ietf.org
References: <163777315136.16773.10633006296842101587@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <4e4527b6-b0b3-33f3-3849-8a593fe29a1d@nic.cz>
 <ybly22j7m5m.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
 <95a4103b-dd26-17ba-d4dd-ac82b2bd510f@nic.cz>
 <yblh78m34og.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
 <3d348d91-1f36-3e06-7da4-b683ef0d9348@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 10:06:39 -0800
In-Reply-To: <3d348d91-1f36-3e06-7da4-b683ef0d9348@nic.cz> (=?utf-8?B?IlZs?=
 =?utf-8?B?YWRpbcOtciDEjHVuw6F0Iidz?=
 message of "Mon, 7 Mar 2022 12:06:39 +0100")
Message-ID: <yblilspwsb4.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sxNpoAGrXDmyTYiq6x_nKp7qRLU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 18:07:33 -0000

Vladim=C3=ADr =C4=8Cun=C3=A1t <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> writes:

> On 26/02/2022 00.30, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > Validating resolvers MAY choose to not respond to NSEC3 records with
> > iterations larger than 0.
>=20
> The -05 version sounds clearer here than -04 ("not respond" above) or
> -03.=C2=A0 Thanks.

You should check -06 too -- I restructured it to read better (IMHO)=20
--=20
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI