Return-Path: <gwiley@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C737A1ADBFC
 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ncaxcsTWMatM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x261.google.com (mail-oi0-x261.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::261])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78711AD378
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oies6 with SMTP id s6so3827721oie.1
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=verisign_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id
 :accept-language:content-language:user-agent:content-type
 :mime-version; bh=wc5m1QJ08IiInkZhItl36/32TVCxxqisFENh4lJKf4U=;
 b=dg38LF/ebJvW0tlW60VIx+VTYKJvXpwvZC/uc5DIS9Gf+VCv3JlJuFEHVHHTe2h49j
 XSPOT21FWwje6bOwRLN/YZ7AsNvJhlWKuags6JTx2xGOIH7wHq3sPsB3erNQGaidYBmu
 vXaXFL4jT8xkWtV1u2nslAzSRbB10+IFJvXv6UFVUjHG0A0g/hwfycMp4L6lKBIQDd6M
 K3u1r8OMMDKQ4s2npDmzei+5QvIsmo8wJ8YTX7IijfClbLt6perF11F+laCMdy16/Li3
 UhdPT03VtQGQRLJfIvlwSEsvIL4uqh0XC28FKAHxEWBvHSxDlC0LvwoDDEBwiYv6/bzc
 cjTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date
 :message-id:accept-language:content-language:user-agent:content-type
 :mime-version;
 bh=wc5m1QJ08IiInkZhItl36/32TVCxxqisFENh4lJKf4U=;
 b=fiGVVOjEFmFDosdUjgRh1jxLypRKJf5X+rDdHAHevHDT4qjG5epg4RSs9WeznguLGu
 946KcpILwZXMdSQzAeqfnbayV/Tx6s4x68zn0TkEBYw7L7tcydDvvk2GRbP8Ktw60eyF
 VcffUmcEa7xutF2KLghkwyODDQ+NXQ2mA5wU0Qpv21ckAOTJGVp9vpQ1kxJjindAdNtR
 PLM9lU3uJimoH7P+lXoQWc134xFLlBqtu1AeFu+WInK1MBW6VeHaz19mEGAzPq+pGszm
 PVimR2+j1TF8AGD8mewK2YDfLQAGwjpyHAKyLk2qRUt1cn/6DWiqYFzqKPvHAf7Wcf7f
 Z2hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmhup3VvV64wCdkJ6pw5L7XawGxYDdiWUA/5em3zWmlXgqyCJ9PXPi3c0WSI1kcR1oYLYiL0dlx0jpLzvnYjx0rUgeN+g==
X-Received: by 10.140.101.41 with SMTP id t38mr9405621qge.53.1447343941175;
 Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com.
 [72.13.63.42])
 by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id s72sm1144041qkl.9.2015.11.12.07.59.00
 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206])
 by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tACFx0Kp001619
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:59:00 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by
 brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 12
 Nov 2015 10:59:00 -0500
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: are there recent studies of client side/ISP firewalls
 interfering with EDNS?
Thread-Index: AQHRHWMLeWj+FK8I0Uu+D1aEtMmxlw==
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:59:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D26A217F.1E6DC%gwiley@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_D26A217F1E6DCgwileyverisigncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/szH3cqfhbj6Sbd0PiALQ5w_kM-E>
Subject: [DNSOP] are there recent studies of client side/ISP firewalls
 interfering with EDNS?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:59:04 -0000

--_000_D26A217F1E6DCgwileyverisigncom_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have seen the ISC EDNS compliance report (beautiful thing really), but it=
 loks as though the focus is really on the name servers and name server ope=
rators.  Has a recent study been done to examine whether client side/ISP fi=
rewalls are interfering with EDNS?
--
Glen Wiley
Principal Engineer
Verisign, Inc.
(571) 230-7917

A5E5 E373 3C75 5B3E 2E24
6A0F DC65 2354 9946 C63A

--_000_D26A217F1E6DCgwileyverisigncom_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C36F5CAD4D15894A95E1D01530F5722E@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
</head>
<body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-lin=
e-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-fami=
ly: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>
<div>I have seen the ISC EDNS compliance report (beautiful thing really), b=
ut it loks as though the focus is really on the name servers and name serve=
r operators. &nbsp;Has a recent study been done to examine whether client s=
ide/ISP firewalls are interfering with
 EDNS?</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>--&nbsp;</div>
<div>Glen Wiley</div>
</div>
<div>Principal Engineer</div>
<div>Verisign, Inc.</div>
<div>(571) 230-7917</div>
<div></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style=3D"font-family: Menlo; font-size: 11px;">A5E5 E373 3C75 5B=
3E 2E24</span><span style=3D"font-family: Menlo; font-size: 11px;">&nbsp;&n=
bsp;</span></div>
<div><span style=3D"font-family: Menlo; font-size: 11px;">6A0F DC65 2354 99=
46 C63A</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_D26A217F1E6DCgwileyverisigncom_--

