Re: [DNSOP] Changes since draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13

Antoin Verschuren <antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl> Tue, 23 October 2012 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Antoin.Verschuren@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4997221F8653 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mg9rbcpQBvGQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ede1-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [94.198.152.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEC221F855A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kahubcasn02.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.74]) by ede1-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id q9NEdLMF012233-q9NEdLMH012233 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:39:21 +0200
Received: from KAHUBCAS1.SIDN.local (192.168.2.41) by kahubcasn02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:39:20 +0200
Received: from [94.198.156.18] (94.198.156.18) by KAHUBCAS1.SIDN.local (192.168.2.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:39:20 +0200
Message-ID: <5086AC18.1030902@sidn.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:39:20 +0200
From: Antoin Verschuren <antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <507D691F.9000404@nlnetlabs.nl> <50868055.6030809@sidn.nl> <20121023132955.GH21418@miek.nl> <311AADB4-956F-499B-971A-AE0D8BB3921B@ucd.ie> <5086A308.80202@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <5086A308.80202@ogud.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [94.198.156.18]
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Changes since draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:39:23 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 23-10-12 16:00, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

> While I think the idea of passing keys though the registry between 
> operator has some merit I do not see it as viable alternative
> outside few cc'tld's thus it it does not deserve to be included in
> a BCP without full debate.

I gave 4 reasons, not one.
Running code and current practice being important ones for the IETF.

But most of all, I fail to see the motivation for the current advice
in the document.
If there is no motivation but just an opinion, I think the advice
should be deleted from the document.

- -- 
Antoin Verschuren

Technical Policy Advisor SIDN
Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands

P: +31 26 3525500  F: +31 26 3525505  M: +31 6 23368970
mailto:antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl  xmpp:antoin@jabber.sidn.nl
http://www.sidn.nl/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQhqwYAAoJEDqHrM883AgnEcMIAI0wvqBbWwHiC5G6pJ2PjyOd
ejdQ2F/VeA2AqE6IAsQ7nkhTgaeKwg5JNEMQXFNagZgwPLxKT8XAuFW7+WsbTivy
zEqNbgNV/sDSPLjmW3qJ7Lh4PZArOsgrv5I/bDLOnZI6PPCHBb4j7LnN5pMZMy3R
A71P8A/WhPUo+1GK1rpz97kS9gcr+2B1LoLsm1dSnrJn4sFk8s+zHa6b4KhjpgWE
NtStUf7D44ffBcZUrdhK63KqQ4RY1sLxSXMyFZMU3WOVBJ+SnUTCLIe+GVM1d0T9
/zeBl0G3ohuVAWKj3IG3bSlUfzN6rdMi9sW82dGx+Grb9g1VUMr1ywSN5d16eMw=
=2P9F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----