IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-08.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 24 September 2019 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5581200F5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.218
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsoAhpcCGkIb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B560412002F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:47346) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1iCiAr-000MWh-i8 (Exim 4.92.2) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:36:01 +0100
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:36:01 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, Bernardo Innocenti <codewiz@google.com>, Puneet Sood <puneets@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <ed280f95-8341-4c92-08e1-e3ccd340d249@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1909241130410.11612@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <156541541443.1807.17639675157921847600@ietfa.amsl.com> <yblblwwhmq3.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <a1885a32-d5aa-9e08-6ef4-b9db35d882af@time-travellers.org> <ybltv9ymdxl.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <ed280f95-8341-4c92-08e1-e3ccd340d249@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-176031738-1569321361=:11612"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/t58gEa9eqYks5MqtnsEYwwSQrEA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:36:07 -0000

Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> wrote:
>
> IMHO the most useful information is dichotomy:
>
> a) the problem is local (= call network admin/ISP/telco)
>
> b) the problem is remote (= call your bank because their internetbanking
> broke and _do not your bother ISP_).

I think that's helpful.

There's an interesting case wrt blocking / censorship, e.g. "near block"
=> ISP is responsible; "far block" => required by force of law.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Portland, Plymouth, Biscay: West or southwest 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8
later except in Biscay. Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough,
occasionally high later in northwest Plymouth. Rain or thundery showers. Good,
occasionally poor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email