Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 07 March 2014 10:49 UTC
Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD94D1A012B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:49:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBBqwd9u559C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41-v6.csi.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:8::e:f41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C070D1A006F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:49:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:39724) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1WLsLe-00037x-Sj (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:49:50 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1WLsLe-0001PY-QW (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:49:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:49:50 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3E0DC692-7BA0-4672-BB10-82B854BB69CE@hopcount.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1403071025270.19416@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20140307100524.2F42810CD58F@rock.dv.isc.org> <3E0DC692-7BA0-4672-BB10-82B854BB69CE@hopcount.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tMhMzKWCyWndDqG3wmz5lX3W-n4
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:49:59 -0000
Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote: > > https://xkcd.com/927/ So from the standards development point of view, I think what this is saying is that success is more likely to come from building on what people are already doing and nudging more of them to do it more similarly. The problem with the parent update process is that there's a hopeless zoo of more-or-less crappy APIs almost none of which are good foundations. For a push-style protocol there are two parts: finding out where to push the update; and how to push the update. The where question ought to be answered by whois or weirds or _update SRV records. The how question ought to be answered by EPP (from registrant to registrar) or DNS UPDATE. It would be nice if there were software to gateway between one and the other. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Humber: Southwest 6 to gale 8, becoming variable 4, then southeast 5 later. Slight or moderate. Rain, becoming fair. Moderate becoming good.
- [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Wallstrom
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Wallstrom
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent Paul Wouters