[DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sun, 16 February 2014 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B31A0333 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:05:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Rs3lOVHG-Ds for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org (alpha.virtualized.org [199.233.229.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039C21A0332 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D1B84CEE; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 21:05:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha.virtualized.org [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76887-08; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 21:05:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-67-169-100-133.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.100.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc@virtualized.org) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B4C184B43; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 21:05:00 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_766A2852-A689-438E-8E69-48965AC7D457"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:04:54 -0800
Message-Id: <D82F49E8-9A06-4F52-8E3E-DF5C8D0B7549@virtualized.org>
References: <CAESS1RPh+UK+r=JzZ9nE_DUqcvNtZiS6TNt1CDN-C0uiU7HP=A@mail.gmail.com> <52FEF407.30405@redbarn.org> <20140215140133.GA6990@sources.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tN8RnuZXPhgtSuv7_TYx67hEEm8
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 02:05:07 -0000

[perpass dropped from ccs]

On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> At ietf87 it was planned to  have a discussion at dnsop about this
> continued problem of drafts that fall between operations and extensions
> and the fact that dnsext closed down. Nothing happened at ietf87 or
> ietf88. I hope to see this as agenda item for dnsop this meeting.
> 
> We need a WG to discuss DNS innovation.

At the Vancouver DNSOP meeting when there was some discussion I thought was protocol development related, I got up to the mike asked if DNSOP was the right place for that discussion, being righteously indignant that DNSOP would discuss something non-operational.  However, after sitting down someone pointed out to me that one of the common recurrent complaints about the IETF is that operators tend to get excluded and that maybe DNSOP is actually the best place to discuss DNS protocol development since that's where operators go.  

Perhaps DNSOP actually is the DNS innovation WG (if perhaps only as a seeding ground)?

Regards,
-drc