Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-dnsop-error-page-00.txt

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Thu, 09 July 2020 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8723A083E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 00:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SC2uHxdIUZUG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 00:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED80C3A082A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 00:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D74B6A310; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:22:30 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1594279350; bh=e/nzhK+zwFruHwHocxeD6EqS/pC7jBpbBr9OVy7aSC0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=sbsU5k/uagzYwXkFnSmqLSEVA4Pf6OWxGhGRrP7d40PIZZJrB8HoBE4ONAvmg2HAO 5bc+TQZ+rza2Sa18w7i9/LEPBQazO1k3EZZiZ24jjJq2Mv2c3tqxddssgxFXjwajCL 6abUrCOaSOOwFou921OYYxKpZ4mPgioXLDxfc/+1gieAf8anlscpH+YbxXdH6EWE6S CG36Pda5cNzo2gmknzitFVGOP+0Iv1ywFGcrV0s6VjwmNXJS+svnBKyfTrjLZTOEc0 bqUwB3nQJ4puoXzyCK1cd+daCu7NOV4lG+/2AfKSGiNuRHfXOxZJZdb4k9cxGpJ5Zs x3949P7xZdrGA==
Received: from appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DE8C3C0294; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:22:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:22:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <710326065.1495.1594279350018@appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFpG3gft=HFvqfmCHk29FWuwmdTj9sAZhosHgjQib6c_BSXQeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <159419312721.4560.7461331648236111056@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFpG3gcKVHxQo0USq-K3-jYnVUULiHU=asBx4P8bFm0Rw6V42Q@mail.gmail.com> <1932065230.926.1594213116969@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com> <CAFpG3gft=HFvqfmCHk29FWuwmdTj9sAZhosHgjQib6c_BSXQeA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1493_674014055.1594279349955"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev2
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tOgGGpW8aeWg1z3M--QsvXw-MhA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-dnsop-error-page-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 07:22:36 -0000

>     Il 09/07/2020 08:53 tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
> 
>         > >         Regarding section 4, in DPRIVE (on draft bcp-op) we have recently been told that the IETF does not recommend in its best practices anything which is not strictly technical (in that case, it was about communicating to users the jurisdiction under which DNS resolution is provided):
> > 
> >         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/rJ7R3OBUyySfEyJgwhoxs1DNGuc/
> > 
> >         So I would assume that that section is out of scope as well, and I would remove it.
> > 
> >     > 
>     My understanding is the "jurisdiction" is out of scope but not RPS (see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-12#section-6) 
> 
Sure, those three points were agreed with Alissa as the scope of any statement that might be described in the best practice:

o  Relates _only_ to matters around to the technical operation of DNS
privacy services, and not on any other matters.

o  Does not attempt to offer an exhaustive list for the contents of
an RPS.

o  Is not intended to form the basis of any legal/compliance
documentation.

So I would take that as guidance here as well: I don't think we can say whether it should contain regulatory information, redress measures etc. (though that would indeed be advisable). Also, in Italy the ISP, when blocking websites by court order, is required to show a page which is exactly defined by law and by the public authority that "seized" the website (e.g. https://www.startmag.it/wp-content/uploads/butac.png ) - it is not allowed to change it in any way. I would expect that to happen in other countries as well.

--

Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy