Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41F11A020D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:58:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQ-6b9Au_KZM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CECB1A02F5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (c-75-69-155-67.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [75.69.155.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 494098A031 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:58:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:58:38 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140213155838.GH25409@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20140210205838.15973.63281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E63B37B9-EFA0-43A5-9AC5-81CEC23C342C@viagenie.ca> <00BDA580-984F-41D1-8659-04278737A526@hopcount.ca> <20140213145932.GE25409@mx1.yitter.info> <BA548E83-4D14-4A08-A958-190F541D2337@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BA548E83-4D14-4A08-A958-190F541D2337@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:58:43 -0000

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:23:52AM -0500, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> ok, maybe this suggestion below is weird, but... 
> - since they are not looking at a real delegated TLD.
> - why not just register a URN namespace and use it as they see fit?

Why didn't they do that in the first place?

A


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com