IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF meeting prep and what

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 19 June 2021 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48373A192A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4RQcDsTwtED for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C293A1929 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id bp38so19582987lfb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3XHpD10lndFhL+IpcupZwyUysRYQwT460KkrNSVVdr4=; b=RAXJBfVvOiI+aCRB19MGYOx/1zMMLIEqbpUtRfXW1lyfhyq+8MGlDZmeXCNQOTEFpg hyV9QR7ubP3giir6o8ZhZ9V6kr/JfLzijCkhWiX3cyYpjavmf/+4ndzt3ZRhS76Xb9V1 15MNGBL6Cv/GzL8hnRFmZXq0dAE0pLVGPYXLvvKTGGcfDGFxb5HQmyNl2PeeI9Paxg2q EFCcqd4HO8a2tNSCDjjj3ypXgGLWiPFAalrMQHP+pJs93eLbu+OzQOsMlC/SS7wjY9Sn OqH8k0MndZESpdHggvJADoKy7RjAn3QrHUvgHenfNyOrjwoYTyYwGh3Utm/8FDCvLF+q iYpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3XHpD10lndFhL+IpcupZwyUysRYQwT460KkrNSVVdr4=; b=lW0jPmZ1S3fXMTTsdcB603Mq2UHh45GGV8GnPLBM/V6Le+iyVFxrKEaYeOUyK4WSPC xdrwqOY198rMoId2qkhaWM7wn2eTXnZPy20DdWMgZSdauII4jr3erbr8nea3lFAmjJWf StoYqOOTX1mUJIn2w2lm+peFcJov+Jmh5KyIAn5CoBJzxmBCuqCi1f0GYYvepTgMa2D7 YhwY3T1E8ZenLEfgkkfUjR3CHuxODr5aNu6SS9y2DvCkZyECDzbx1s2qDUiCtYPOxbQq znm76RBOjsoC25ZjUMrddO2MBsznSXOAUSSkXnBNYwudBo6HkutB1AGagCwHjfmlmK3i TBmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533l9pdykJG1rs2+lnm1rPjUiW3bgLo6bT5cgCarIqclzvs2Aisa WBkxieeYrBY/L1XzUEM0KEzKByGvEw3ZyFqBmvw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy33MX3IbUybAjWJhB48sOY3K1KLjrBKIxZSxQXvsKrFYbHaQ5xYecOe7jJuk08d3sC5pI/c/m1LxavjnbLsxs=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:52b3:: with SMTP id r19mr5329185lfm.525.1624063741918; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+ESB-W9DvdRjCrdXgaZUWzX5b5cUvu-Ue3zjRrVsnCB2w@mail.gmail.com> <5a9b35c5806e36b0802be493d87beb8ef2fef18d.camel@powerdns.com> <ybltulu98e6.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <9E1B73F0-D1AA-4510-978E-34A75524CD0C@icann.org> <CADZyTkkESx1gVZptP0GYR8Y55GDwJeRGtd2VHeCZRe+Z8sm8oA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkkESx1gVZptP0GYR8Y55GDwJeRGtd2VHeCZRe+Z8sm8oA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 20:48:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Gv71Fyn_2b6GRDQOeTTWqZx3d+mTUdOEL2Nr0rRDXjXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e01b005c513ce8d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tV_qjCYUCjLZkyqR6X8kBj_4jSk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF meeting prep and what
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 00:49:11 -0000

This is all great feedback everyone, please don't stop.

I wanted to say we'll talk to Warren on the 5011-considerations document,
but Warren is a co-author, so we'll need to start over.

Someone mentioned Mark's glue-is-not-optional draft. The chairs really
liked this document,
and wanted to keep it alive.  We've reached out to
mark several times with no response, so we requested the XML from the
secretariat,
dumped it into github, and since it was a short document created the
markdown version
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
If someone wants to assist with this document, please speak up. Otherwise,
one of the
chairs (most likely myself) will step up as editor to proceed with this.

tim


On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:10 PM Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:33 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations
>> >
>> > I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title
>> > (since it's really describing just one problem).  But it's unlikely to
>> > get published as an RFC due to lack of consensus after a long drawn out
>> > conversation where most of the WG stopped reading due to the harsh
>> > language of some messages.
>>
>> For those who don't remember, the lack of consensus was based on too few
>> people speaking to support the document after one WG member kept harshly
>> objecting to some of the wording. This happened well WG Last Call was
>> finished. The chairs decided to kill the document rather than deal
>> decisively with the one obstructionist WG participant.
>>
>> > It can probably be dropped from the active
>> > list because of this.
>>
>> I would like to see the document, which we all already agreed on, moved
>> to IETF Last Call instead.
>>
>> +1
>
>> --Paul Hoffman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email