IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 20 September 2016 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9012B100 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w5tfOWzUlB43 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FCF12B0D3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.76] (50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u8KGuEpY059797 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:56:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230] claimed to be [10.32.60.76]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:56:14 -0700
Message-ID: <5C885445-A49D-4484-BCF7-F6C11A6880E9@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160920161350.GA3288@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20160920161350.GA3288@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tWnF8HSjBNY4XhBIl9sTL7FyXXo>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:56:19 -0000

The definition of QNAME in RFC 2308 feels like it is only relevant when 
discussing negative caching, not in general. All the other uses of the 
1034/1035 definition of QNAME after 2308 feel consistent.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email