Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 03 December 2013 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7551AC828 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:11:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id brgXY90zS2Hg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397761AC3DA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 50C2328019C; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:11:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF2A280173; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:11:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403E4B38038; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:11:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:11:25 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Andreas Gustafsson <gson@araneus.fi>
Message-ID: <20131203171125.GC17211@nic.fr>
References: <20131201164841.GB12135@sources.org> <BF87877A-8989-4AA4-9ED1-52C82E1BC538@nominum.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312011206480.12923@bofh.nohats.ca> <20131202151651.GD16808@mx1.yitter.info> <21148.47909.375332.11515@guava.gson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21148.47909.375332.11515@guava.gson.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.2
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:11:59 -0000

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:53:57PM +0200,
 Andreas Gustafsson <gson@araneus.fi> wrote 
 a message of 20 lines which said:

> if they want .exit really badly, they can pay ICANN the same
> application fee any other gTLD applicant would.

Did Apple pay ICANN for .local? No. Why would Tor people have to do
it?