IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNS Terminology: Glue

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 March 2015 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4529C1A0378 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-PrvY-mRxwx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E67631A0267 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wghk14 with SMTP id k14so22746136wgh.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IvQsrGaBJWOZQHi72peD4j2oF4HOziqpJVim4YeOl/w=; b=LSyzvPF8bEOJjUaAQO1VTVxAXS8kSjY7xlLbDdiSzZGt3wnjXOocEZWB5oehmeHnOv EqvtBy5uSwlcblpDSuEKPS75/LcHGKfAikMG+Rfr9BbTTbscJ+hHUUenfusB3dWkxMQ4 QOiOXVrbcHg/lQPnOd1jeE/RHFtm/OR1w/3iUWcNE2ckxc40wyIcZteQGA3qttRqp6oR ItTjUzbl+0smhG7qAztef6Qzb8coMMvEU0bfVLZ3jNd4Bm8JtUroUtq5wKEmPU4q7ZrI jrZm23Ur+9nO9nGNVF6PPePehLvWpkL7R6JdqgmmI9XJ4OPXS7Pi3RniRkE1lCvLVYS1 slPA==
X-Received: by 10.180.106.225 with SMTP id gx1mr141604645wib.53.1426247853676; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from feather.local ([86.47.154.189]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vh8sm2519375wjc.12.2015.03.13.04.57.32 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
references: <m2vbi6ju6z.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <7fb23340.93af6.14c0e3c80ef.Coremail.zhengwang09@126.com> <CAMm+LwiPQJ7o-qMayrouHQ9dROuCaiZCiqMmBHwnn-M+n=jdpg@mail.gmail.com> <911A1814-2C2A-41E2-84B5-5B2B2CDB1B8E@vpnc.org> <CAMm+LwgRKDFQg2FDz=1Eo_DJ9ZF-SEA_96n1j64v536E03NhwQ@mail.gmail.com> <1CB95C5F-E0B2-4A3E-9EDE-E2EE35DED037@vpnc.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
message-id: <5502D0AA.5070403@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:57:30 +0000
user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0a2
mime-version: 1.0
in-reply-to: <1CB95C5F-E0B2-4A3E-9EDE-E2EE35DED037@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tbSr-Tx7pgHpfxhJeYsYRrslAQE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS Terminology: Glue
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:57:36 -0000


On 3/12/15 3:21 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
>>> Its a bug in the spec.
>>
>> The terminology document is the wrong place to deal with bugs in the spec. We are happy to list differences of opinion about what a term means if they appear in different RFCs, but not to try to fix bugs.
>>
>>
>> Maybe.
>
> No, definitely. If the WG wants to fix bugs, it should do so in a standards-track document.
>

Paul is correct.  While the discussion of Glue (or the lack thereof) is 
a flaw in the documents, it should not be fixed in this document.

tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email