IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] extension of DoH to authoritative servers

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 14 February 2019 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F55613115A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 01:10:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9q2cjkQ_Joa7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 01:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2906131056 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 01:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D43902803B9; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:10:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id CE2562804D4; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:10:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68902803B9; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:10:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24B8642C581; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:10:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2DD94010D; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:10:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:10:20 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "zuopeng@cnnic.cn" <zuopeng@cnnic.cn>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190214091020.exsmoy7usknfcigw@nic.fr>
References: <2019021215560470371417@cnnic.cn> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902120846480.18026@bofh.nohats.ca> <201902131403257357123@cnnic.cn> <20190213134408.ri5iy42q7u7h37ui@sources.org> <201902141436144299614@cnnic.cn> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902140232160.19964@bofh.nohats.ca> <201902141611200680999@cnnic.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201902141611200680999@cnnic.cn>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.7
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.2.14.90016
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tdrVeA1C5HwZ3VYZNPHty8DSobo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] extension of DoH to authoritative servers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:10:24 -0000

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:11:20PM +0800,
 zuopeng@cnnic.cn <zuopeng@cnnic.cn> wrote 
 a message of 102 lines which said:

> No. i might did not explain it clearly.

It was clear but you repeat the same stuff, without taking into
account the remarks (or the existing documents, such as
draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-resolver-to-auth). Both Paul Wouters and David
Conrad explained that the DNS is more complicated than that (think of
forwarders, for instance) and you did not address their remarks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email