IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Tue, 18 June 2024 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3FCC1CAF34; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n8dDMxJc928Z; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DF9C1CAE95; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 45IHiCkk018021 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:44:12 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.34; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:49:05 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.034; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:49:05 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHawabaiCFPtQiSCEiMalo6fHVTALHOQaqA
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:49:05 +0000
Message-ID: <0229675A-A248-4FB3-8CF4-62F966EA8AA3@icann.org>
References: <171866661003.804.6572056160990742967@ietfa.amsl.com> <3BED375B-86EA-444E-9604-C4C9D5321DA6@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BED375B-86EA-444E-9604-C4C9D5321DA6@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <F577699643154D408332918DB4E35EFE@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-06-18_02,2024-06-17_01,2024-05-17_01
Message-ID-Hash: NADUFP4TKDOP7EWB62PUMOFGQ3PXOVSD
X-Message-ID-Hash: NADUFP4TKDOP7EWB62PUMOFGQ3PXOVSD
X-MailFrom: paul.hoffman@icann.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tey7PW6IrwlwpoGWw4_WFyhWBhQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Responding to one bit of Duane's response.

On Jun 18, 2024, at 10:40, Wessels, Duane <dwessels=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>> What should an authoritative nameserver return as zone version if it is
>> configured as authoritative nameserver but can't get the zone version (eg
>> because "no permission to read file")  One way would be to allow it to return
>> a zero length for ANY type and define that as an error condition.
> 
> I think the authors will need to discuss how to handle error conditions like this
> and get back to you.

PaulW's DISCUSS on this topic doesn't make sense. If a server is authoritative for a zone, it has know the version of the zone: the zone is incomplete without its version. If the server doesn't know the version, it should not be answering any queries for that zone at all.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status