[DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 July 2024 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13B4C15109C; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csaSxuqvI7tH; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29104C151538; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-58bac81f3f9so2868039a12.2; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720023358; x=1720628158; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Jgzn+eS+mV32+mvkEkplYQx+esEV9ZMaErHNf/eJ/w=; b=I8yc9WfsMOY0NX7l9J0kf2ZEOp3lkQwTSeB05/594m6rKY9L4cZOE2d9M2CK5ZN+7V jBK32Y6h/0Gjzc4pSKX0P9RE66JxZJ7DoRpVHcWjOgzZ29RjnyQjDxCW/h2Cz1VMPDZQ iAv0EKjTZx0IJY5m5IEbwC4PsKv3MqZWqJFKvo/Au2Dlhmx0TofiqLk9BU/gguawApj1 dDxBjxLr9YHMc0+D9+q+0Zrom7qwS0Ero8cO7YWKCe/rRMdJGzlNd2iMB7DB1uf5S5B3 coOluXQyzVMcvDZuoSncSuu7ITwA3T4yRvvUxH6bb9jJjUiq3Naxlk95vXHJxnKriCPn cGoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720023358; x=1720628158; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4Jgzn+eS+mV32+mvkEkplYQx+esEV9ZMaErHNf/eJ/w=; b=NrHUM2LikOWr0p5V51TSJjA+55QryPCTIhdEBpEyUX0J/17NbsMVI+aXqAtIjzbOpd 6ulJwjShEvL6lqxr5v/aansjZWFvzTbuTo9YrHB8OWNq7hTbJUD3UBVGTo3+xSi1vgGW cVOlTDqIwk5y4JV8B3CdcSTLou7rKFXIZE8N6+eLLtV+ZUxYVpezL3KV+topxgaNKS0o Jpc02Ar6qyTunMNs6+Om9QNEUzijm/Q+TblJ+lhjvKLD7BwDejIZdNTnh+jyDLICu8uO oPb1/vBSmfz9FwLTo5qqyfOZOJT06dVFX9fhN214QF/EXAZbx9j//iZJyiam8931dlB6 qKDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YztwUbHHL9wVImD+HNHHNwYQirrCrwrVsLcW5N9FFU20vlf+kj5 98df78RoqUXTJLzT2faO6cbIls+Yeji56NlOD+078vGfbfJHytU7Izy/1BSUkzEvdT+O9n8NY5P 2bYLiQX5wSNiowswf0MP/cOIgk77f9Bs0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHsWAWDhurF4ZCuLYTsNzL6FtzxIwch+BLFA4gkXd189ga6uV6r04k9ItSxMRN/xhRhR2cnyxo5nWU4MMV3AUs=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d7c4:0:b0:58c:74ae:24ee with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-58c74ae26a7mr1642208a12.38.1720023357900; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+EGh2N8tssBRskH=PVXV1e1eON4z=8E1JWPypNUyZVwLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EGh2N8tssBRskH=PVXV1e1eON4z=8E1JWPypNUyZVwLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:15:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FxVCMODD7P00KXyDp8HkUFkK=QMrWbSoGBx8+=61hbUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040d078061c5a259a"
Message-ID-Hash: OB7Y5ZUINGST2E3ROLGALVZLQLJBVKIL
X-Message-ID-Hash: OB7Y5ZUINGST2E3ROLGALVZLQLJBVKIL
X-MailFrom: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tpkc13VxdXfX76UyOf1rqATaXfQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

All

The Working Group Last Call has been completed
for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis.  The chairs are in agreement that there is
consensus to move this forward.
We will mark it as such in the Datatracker.

We have chatted with the authors, and they are going to address all
comments and are "highly confident" they will a new version before the
document cut off on Monday.  The chairs are highly confident as well.

Thanks for the great reviews.

tim


On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:32 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> All
>
> The authors have updated the document based on some early reviews.  Since
> this is an update from the original RFC7958, I urge folks to take a look at
> the diff from the original:
>
>
>
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=rfc7958&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-02&difftype=--html
>
>
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis
> "DNSSEC Trust Anchor Publication for the Root Zone"
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis/
>
> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Informational
>
> Benno will be the document shepherd
>
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
>
> For WGLC, we need positive support and constructive comments; lack of
> objection is not enough.
> So if you think this draft should be published as an RFC, please say so.
>
> If you feel the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out
> with your reasons.
>
>
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: July
> 3rd, 2024
>
> thanks
>
>
> tim
>