IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call [draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse]

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 October 2016 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213341294F6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaqI-U-LjQQm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 952CC1294E0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m5so15683329qtb.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wRIxuEOGruiNl6beDzmNUFkaR8/qmPbsXMazkv/mjYk=; b=UiyhZ8l/pbuWrtWMDzsGN/3WubqmelG/UkoMQRfr18O7F0y5txubc3mYLDXBtslY8U 3hvYuN+IrOfXOyWiC70tZWd6id+2aetiIwJBsrh1HRMgFO6lmYVZtchYvgl3HNtBFtQg JhasDF6WF5t5vRxDLqdupRIpy/Fiepno5qLfYYODO+s/ryxV+zJnSpDtR7AcukOaKJj9 91TuWVF5/UnsTRSY9FfvbuLHYgfiKt2nXdxJe8Ap3HzxK9hBCDUhZ3gQkwkZ7F1eDASl DDFnzErWrWZ4BTEACr/9fohe1c2hBIT1qi4DDDIb42aLmD4qxsq5ynt/ouZLrVNqQdCd 61hQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wRIxuEOGruiNl6beDzmNUFkaR8/qmPbsXMazkv/mjYk=; b=EqV5pRb4TQWywJUYmwmrhO+yaK5/eFr/MJUTrgNsaZ2c0kuUCKMKbYEEuTvo/7fSeX UBUESCrqlmAa/6xKlnLmUdzLejyigCMvLxDj88DDkhfD5AttUFnQMGGmNc3IQFxhktIR H3HNOjnLOPxIylIhQx2rOLiGRVTt6BHFm9LpSQWkvqBADg4MRWVF8nb8aqwIDlbCxKAR aUMbkjVXyFZMh/ldYNx1mSsjl2pYu4c8ccHX5CeCvpAMRAZcQy3+MBajE2pHOntjPehu YzOmjCnM2eOMf0u7x3EIek/yy2Mfk4PWtfur/XXJeroIwOX6oIX4kVxEoKI+V+k+JTdI S1Ng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlcy87TnaaSRIrSjBWeI4qRw5ARTrJ70+iXRsuJar/KnKISk/pXDkzhmW5hL7X35Q==
X-Received: by 10.237.32.108 with SMTP id 99mr17923509qta.17.1475804868464; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 18:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from twicinski-ltm1.internal.salesforce.com ([204.14.236.152]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q190sm6160587qke.31.2016.10.06.18.47.47 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Oct 2016 18:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iJrgF3w-=0e8XbBLbDNPN9Nyuw15WS7AcZO5LbzBLKR8A@mail.gmail.com> <20161004192237.15135.qmail@ary.lan> <CA+nkc8CNx9-ROWkV8gs5N5+Pjw1NJb8qQ3DPXAxDUC5+mJv-=w@mail.gmail.com> <20161006163735.GA18000@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1610061248310.47126@ary.qy> <20161006195816.GA20784@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3a75080b-b14b-ebad-777f-58014730058a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:47:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161006195816.GA20784@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tsW4nG0aioAzvPSqKbbwyaVN3dA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call [draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 01:47:51 -0000


On 10/6/16 3:58 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:47:28PM -0400,
>  John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote
>  a message of 34 lines which said:
>
>> It still seems to me that the time to add the wildcards back in
>> would be less than the time to do two separate documents.  Unless
>> there's some reason that this needs to be published in a hurry,
>
> Not for me, I'm fine with a delay (there have been many important
> changes between -02 and -03, during the WGLC, so, some time to digest
> and study them may be worth it).
>

I agree. There is no need to hurry this along. I'd rather get this right.

tim

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status