Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4DB1294ED for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2u3_4Qsz4rWe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2493C1286CA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n21so137958632qta.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FWBg+ITn8+BUbtRj888LpTaZFdrLCBWU8ox54/hFd9s=; b=AsteX9E0uAwfEUCjaTBefjXT9mQ7U/ACopPBNLnRblBCF1YBni6E5rL0gyvMxoX+Ao LLP2x/dn1c6p0aNeNsWSnuoTnuOTldtgpPAJLyqFQXb3UZK9EpIGy66v2SnL/EZ4x51Z ta42m6rvaV+sufz/G3PesDDiYUKSFao+OKb0VdDlX2n51PHrMxjex6HJDChGMSLDe58S J1Pjh7hU4bOY73pftCWDvLYZVgu6tuYXviZktw6cT/dnXsXwBBE9PKJqg+Q2ukayOjQb wVIgu+334Kxia4KENL18q7FoSgjr/1oUuiAJ9Yvv4CCcItmkvOxx23NaXXlh2P4klhPf tKyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FWBg+ITn8+BUbtRj888LpTaZFdrLCBWU8ox54/hFd9s=; b=iv1+Cb+w/0zo4ztieOsrTbXYEzgdkpLhZF3mPXsuf3T3M/ipzYcQRLhe4bYWXostsr aa6LdnWnUx2uWVKZlEqjGp3Ck7/nqrPs2vRoBG5K2WEvdxKW8xlOtkSWYya5BZ0l+Gr1 ItaVytKRsyJFFISGbap36JoRZNE5kNtztJzkPKjfEhaHcFAYhSrTcaQ42JolfkXcUeOh AWWIN/UGyGvfq/Esl3bHvpL4e5DAo651YBVg/D2rpwSxlJcYHcdvZPu3Kb0l+pNrlZC/ gHYl7wVVOLagQKRqz91ZCA/vfisW3vLQ2pNdHlH+XewTEJB9p+M/o5d+3FVlGWSxhPnb YH9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2WIYNMcbHJTezu7kaJJm4yT44e5NLODQSipZSlPAIs2gqgJyCZfGOiySLp/RWuiQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.39.150 with SMTP id a22mr21449518qtd.233.1490121412184; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:fdd5:deb9:4238:5a0c? ([2601:18f:801:600:fdd5:deb9:4238:5a0c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v26sm15296528qtc.13.2017.03.21.11.36.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|f5ec18bf30629ea610ca97cb1b0c9729y2KIYP03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|2D82810E-E92E-498E-99E8-0D9C467559CF@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:36:50 -0400
Cc: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AEF92A64-911D-4A14-B000-FD54B44B7453@gmail.com>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <1A714782-2EE5-49F8-A6C0-29852E90DA9C@rfc1035.com> <AA7C5D4D-CE9E-41D4-9382-A232D379ACCD@gmail.com> <2D82810E-E92E-498E-99E8-0D9C467559CF@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|f5ec18bf30629ea610ca97cb1b0c9729y2KIYP03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|2D82810E-E92E-498E-99E8-0D9C467559CF@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tyn_168dfyzUeW06QMepmMsHlvQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:36:56 -0000

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 17:30, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Jim,
>> 
>> In the interests of preserving a distinction here that I believe is important: 
>> 
>>> On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 13:54, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Suggesting we postpone .homenet while figuring out a new IETF/ICANN
>>>> process, something that can take years, would basically doom this rename
>>>> and install .home as the defacto standard.
>>> 
>>> At the risk of pouring petrol on the fire, .home *is* the defacto standard. Queries for this TLD account for ~4% of the 2016 DITL root server traffic. That's more than every delegated TLD except .com and .net. And the traffic for .home has been increasing in both absolute and relative terms in recent years. 3-4 years ago, it was ~3% of the DITL data set.
>> 
>> “Lots of queries for .home” doesn’t imply that it’s a “defacto standard” for anything in particular.
>> 
>> Is there any evidence connecting the use of the string “.home” in queries to the DNS with any particular protocol, type of equipment, network configuration, or software? 
> 
> In the UK, I believe the largest residential ISP has used the .home suffix on millions of its CPEs for several years.

Do you happen to know how names with the .home suffix are resolved?

- Ralph

> 
> How much of that leaks is another question.
> 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop