Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 06 April 2016 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F8712D1C9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LwSn6U098Ka3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1525112D6B0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 59EE732838; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:25:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 36D26F0189A; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:22:09 -0300
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Message-ID: <20160406172209.GA29730@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAKr6gn3rLUWD+qbKzOpqJ4a8RkA20HHmcQZ7jyNqbB5n+a5N=w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3rLUWD+qbKzOpqJ4a8RkA20HHmcQZ7jyNqbB5n+a5N=w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 15.10 (wily)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tzvHbHUPE53_Mqv6VtXElX8-McU>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:25:11 -0000
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:41:40PM -0300, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > I see some utility in having DNSSEC apply over special use names, > because authenticated non-existence is a strong proof of intent, and > would make a 'not in this domainspace' switch have a robust basis. Well, the root is signed so, if the draft is implemented, the DNAMEs will be signed (the target zone, empty.as112.arpa, is not, for good reasons). > On that understanding, how would DNAME redirection work for > returning sigs over the NX? I'm not sure I understand. A DNAME is like any other record (see anything.sink.bortzmeyer.fr which is signed and redirects to the new AS112). Or do you mean a RFC 7535-bis, with "special" signatures for empty.as112.arpa?
- [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt Ted Lemon