Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information

"Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de> Mon, 05 August 2019 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D5F12016E; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 03:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFNCkEwgG_qR; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 03:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (smtp.guxx.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:322c::25:42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6669012016B; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 03:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id AA5975F42ADD; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:49:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.19.152.235] (p4FF5367C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.245.54.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AE2C5F40973; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:49:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:49:26 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <C624AB70-B1FB-4DB8-82D3-1E399B751C8B@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sx4AaTVivX+re+VYeKaF-UJ+6=+oHMreR3JwCiRq1sikA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+EUk_Qmnk=x3-om1OMjSMFrhd9qFUKTEBk6qWjh6fgRXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sx4AaTVivX+re+VYeKaF-UJ+6=+oHMreR3JwCiRq1sikA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/u1PZzv2wXEdcBNkXq5QzP_VCvVc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 10:49:33 -0000

Moin!

On 4 Aug 2019, at 4:15, Rob Sayre wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:04 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sah-resolver-information/
>>
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
>> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>>
>
> I don't understand what this draft aims to standardize, and I don't think
> it is suitable for adoption.
It describes a protocol for a recursive resolver to publish information about
itself that supposedly applications can use to either connect to it with a
different protocol or display information to an enduser.

And while I agree with others (Paul Wouters, Martin Thomson) that the
document needs work I’d support adoption as I want to see that we work on
the problem of auto discovery of DoH servers which is one of the cases that
can be solved by this draft (when enhanced appropriately)

So long
-Ralf
—--
Ralf Weber