IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> Wed, 11 November 2015 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <el@lisse.NA>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCD91B3302 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:11:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_DR=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkPPmUzDgDY0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oshiyapula.omadhina.co.na (oshiyapula.omadhina.co.na [196.216.41.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401B01B3303 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:11:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oshiyapula.omadhina.co.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408671569E67; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:11:52 +0200 (WAST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omadhina.co.na
Received: from oshiyapula.omadhina.co.na ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (oshiyapula.omadhina.co.na [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNA8-48Gvnf0; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:11:50 +0200 (WAST)
Received: from practice2.local (drlisse-practice-bb-int.cust.na.afrisp.net [196.1.29.168]) by oshiyapula.omadhina.co.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DE81569E60; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:11:49 +0200 (WAST)
References: <20151105235402.39FFC3BF2F29@rock.dv.isc.org> <20151110152511.6f1a1c20@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <20151110204330.C47C63C7D699@rock.dv.isc.org> <7B4B7DEA-C705-437E-8BC1-64D96D55014E@vpnc.org> <0F2DD78A-69C4-49DA-936F-C32D0FC97CC2@rfc1035.com> <5373DDAB-1ED2-489B-AB62-BA7CF6D3DB48@frobbit.se> <20151111064744.GW18315@mournblade.imrryr.org> <314D2303-5654-4BA3-A190-F658DAF60E31@frobbit.se>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Message-ID: <5642EA31.5060801@lisse.NA>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:11:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Thunderbird/1.5.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <314D2303-5654-4BA3-A190-F658DAF60E31@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/u9p-w4Vq5Y3V3uHCC-9eaEyCusw>
Cc: garth.miller@cocca.org.nz, ccnso-techwg@icann.org, el@lisse.NA
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: el@lisse.NA
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:11:55 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

For smaller (cc)TLDs it's not only the enforceability that's
difficult (or as mentioned counterproductive) it's also the real
world (Open Source Tools)

If someone writes me a zonemaster based tool that can read a list of
all domain names in the CoCCAtools PostgreSQL (or even a generic
SQL) database and produce a skeleton of a report (per Registrar)
I'll run it for .NA (and I am sure others using CoCCATools might
too).

I do a lot of LaTeX so I can generate reasonably looking PDF
reports.

We have allocated (staff) resources to a whois cleanup anyway and so
this could be incorporated reducing manual labor.

And we have decided to devote some time at the next TechDay at ICANN
Marrakesh to (algorithmic) data cleanup/verification including
badness checks eg via Secure Domain Foundation and others(.

So whatever comes out of that could, eventually, also go in.

el


On 2015-11-11 08:53, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 7:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> 
>> It may not be possible for everyone to agree on a comprehensive 
>> set of 'wrongs' with no omissions, but it should be possible to 
>> get consensus on a core set of 'wrongs' that are not 
>> controversial.
> 
> Yes and no.  I think going for a minimum will be a good goal, but 
> for example to have lame delegations must by definition be allowed,
> as some registration policies do require delegation (i.e. NS
> records).  So people add NS records in parent zone, but nothing 
> responds there.  Until policy allows registration without 
> delegation, you will see lame delegations.
> 
> Patrik

- -- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el@lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=Kyjz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status